In a message dated 1/18/2003 10:52:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heck, I could put up with 10X the error messages if it
would mean Bob
posting 10X as much. :)You will turn my head young lady.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/18/2003 11:52:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'60s vintage TV drama. Ben Casey was an MD. Ever heard of
Dr. Kildare?
Ben Casey was a neurosurgeon
___
Oops, sorry Doc. In my defense, I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/18/2003 10:52:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Heck, I could put up with 10X the error messages if it
would mean Bob
posting 10X as much.
:)You will turn my head young lady.
Oooh, when your head turns, can we watch
In a message dated 1/19/03 6:17:09 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'60s vintage TV drama. Ben Casey was an MD. Ever heard of
Dr. Kildare?
Ben Casey was a neurosurgeon
___
Oops, sorry Doc. In my defense, I've never watched it
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of J. van Baardwijk
...
A quick check reveals that the rejected message was sent by Bob
Zimmerman.
I suspect that there is some (hidden?) code in his message that
the scanner
on our mailserver
- Original Message -
From: Ronn! Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: A new type of brain scanner
At 09:25 PM 1/16/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MR is the tool of choice for studying brain function. In our
At 08:10 18-01-2003 -0800, Nick Arnett wrote:
A quick check reveals that the rejected message was sent by Bob
Zimmerman. I suspect that there is some (hidden?) code in his message
that the scanner on our mailserver interprets as a possible virus,
probably put there by Bob's mailserver.
Can
- Original Message -
From: J. van Baardwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: FW: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner
This message is copyright 2003 by J. van Baardwijk. No part of this
message
may
In a message dated 1/18/2003 11:10:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
...
A quick check reveals that the rejected message was sent by Bob
Zimmerman.
I suspect that there is some (hidden?) code in his message that
the scanner
on our mailserver interprets as
In a message dated 1/18/2003 12:04:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 09:25 PM 1/16/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MR is the tool of choice for studying brain function. In our institution
ADHD is a major area of research. The head of this program
BJ Casey
On 16 Jan 2003 at 21:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/15/2003 10:17:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The intended applications of MEG - as far as I can see from reading
two papers on it - are in studying brain conditions rather than
individual
In a message dated 1/16/2003 9:44:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but the MR data isn't - I believe - real time as the
MEG data
is. Is that correct?
Functional MR data is absolutely real time. When portions of the brain are active
there is increased blood flow
virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner
Er is mogelijk een virus gevonden in uw bericht.
Uw bericht heeft de geadresseerde niet bereikt. Verwijder s.v.p.
geïnfecteerde bijlagen en probeer het opnieuw.
*
A virus
Nick Arnett wrote:
Anybody here have any idea what this indicates?
That the BrinList Soap Opera goes on? : )
Subject: Possible virus detected - Re: A new type of brain scanner
...
A virus is suspected in your message.
The message you send did not reach the destination
In a message dated 1/15/2003 10:17:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The intended applications of MEG - as far as I can see from reading
two papers on it - are in studying brain conditions rather than
individual patients. It's a powerful research tool which may for the
In a message dated 1/14/2003 11:06:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scientists call it M.E.G. short for Magnetoencephalography a
scanner capable, unlike any before it, of showing activity
in the
brain as it happens.
Lets not get carried away; MEG
On 15 Jan 2003 at 22:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/14/2003 11:06:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scientists call it M.E.G. short for Magnetoencephalography a
scanner capable, unlike any before it, of showing activity in the
brain as it
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/DailyNews/brain_imaging030114.html
A L B U Q U E R Q U E, N.M., Jan. 14 The machine looks like a giant
hair dryer, or perhaps something the Bride of Frankenstein might
fancy. It is one of the most powerful brain-imaging devices in the
world.
Scientists
18 matches
Mail list logo