> Oh, I see, Wikipedia. I am now totally convinced of your standing as
>a eminent public health epidemiologist.
Just to get the population. The critical documentation was that they _did_
exclude the Fallujah area and that their techniques came up with 200k deaths
in that region which, if true
On 2/9/11, Dan Minette wrote:
>
> Had the Fallujah sample been included, the survey's estimate would have been
> of an excess of about 298,000 deaths, with 200,000 concentrated in the 3% of
> Iraq around Fallujah
>
>
> OK, 200k deaths in and right around Fallujah
>
> Well, what's the population
On 2/9/11, Dan Minette wrote:
>>To start with, this is not a "study on US induced deaths in Iraq". More
>>importantly, this story about the Fallujah cluster is something you
>>have simply made up.
>
> Are you saying that Fallujah wasn't excluded because of problems with the
> results there? Seri
I'm really suppose to be working, but this took me 5 minutes to find:
From
http://www.iraqanalysis.org/local/041101lancetpmos.html
Which argued for the Lancet article and against the British government
response and I quote:
Had the Fallujah sample been included, the survey's estimate would hav
Martin wrote
>To start with, this is not a "study on US induced deaths in Iraq". More
>importantly, this story about the Fallujah cluster is something you
>have simply made up.
Are you saying that Fallujah wasn't excluded because of problems with the
results there? Seriously? Or are you saying
On 2/9/11, Dan Minette wrote:
> The Lancet, in my book, has published other studies that were questionable
> from the beginning. For example, they published a study on US induced
> deaths in Iraq that found that a quarter of the population of Faluja had
> died due to the early fighting (early wa
On Feb 9, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and not attribute to malice
what can
be explained by incompetence.
You, sir, are un-American :-). Well said.
Dave
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listi
>I think there have been discussions here previously about vaccines, and
>while there might well be some people, especially children, who can have
>difficulty with multiple vaccines, the issue of vaccination causing autism
>is particularly fear-inducing. But the 1998 'study' has been judged
>frau
een judged fraudulent:
Autism and MMR Vaccine Study an 'Elaborate Fraud,' Charges BMJ
Deborah Brauser
---Educational Item---January 6, 2011 — BMJ is publishing a series of 3
articles and editorials charging that the study published in The Lancet in 1998
by Andrew Wakefield and colleagues l
