Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

2004-02-22 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 01:22 PM 2/17/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: I know gay people, and bi-sexual people, and I can't imagine that Mr. JDG's extremist views should be forced on them or anyone. If JDG is an extremist, where do you place the midpoint? Are your opinions the measure of everyone else's? Kneem

Re: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-19 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:51 AM Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment) From: ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Seeberger wrote

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment)

2004-02-19 Thread Jim Sharkey
Straight, married, kids, moderate. I think that last one makes me a freak around here... ;-) Jim ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! ___

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-19 Thread Deborah Harrell
Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snippage I didn't really think anyone was keeping a chart, but... me, I'm poly, transgendered, sapiosexual, with no children - fit THAT into your categories, Debbi ^_^ blinks opens mouth closes mouth shakes head Umm, I think it's safe to say that

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-19 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 2/19/2004 12:55:02 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And just what is sapiosexual? wicked grin Only has sex with wise persons? Only has sex with humans? ...with the self-aware? Debbi who seems quite boring in comparison Only has sex with

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Gabriel Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 07:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment) Are we as a population representative

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Ticia
Julia Thompson wrote: Miller, Jeffrey wrote: I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much about my life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids (but then, I tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^) Monogamous, hetero, married, kids. Monogamous, bi,

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:59:25 -0800 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
In order to be average some need to be on either side of that average. I tend to think that we average out, but only with a big standard deviation over all the values, so that either side up to the outer limits of the spectrum are represented. ;o) Sonja :o) xGCU: One man and one little man.

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Russell Chapman
Ticia wrote: Monogamous, bi, married, expecting first baby in June... Sounds kinda difficult to be monogamous and bi - I guess one is who you are and one is what you do. I am surprised at the number of bi members - I had always thought it to be purely the stuff of letters to Penthouse. It

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Russell Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:06 PM Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment) Ticia wrote: Monogamous, bi, married, expecting first

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread William T Goodall
On 19 Feb 2004, at 12:08 am, Robert Seeberger wrote: I suspect that pure heterosexuals may not even be a majority. I'm in that 10% minority :) Can I get a disabled sticker for that? -- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog :

RE: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread ritu
Robert Seeberger wrote: One thing you have to remember about Bisexuals. They can blend into any crowd. Remain hidden as long as they like. And only attract notice if they want to be noticed. My personal experience tells me that 40-60% of women I have dated were Bi (to varying degrees) and

Re: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-18 Thread Michael Harney
From: ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Seeberger wrote: One thing you have to remember about Bisexuals. They can blend into any crowd. Remain hidden as long as they like. And only attract notice if they want to be noticed. My personal experience tells me that 40-60% of women I have

Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

2004-02-17 Thread The Fool
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] JDG brings out his inner Bigot: 1) I believe that human sexuality is non-linear. While there are certainly a great many people who are very firmly homosexual or heterosexual, there just as surely exists some subset of people who exist on the

Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

2004-02-17 Thread Michael Harney
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] JDG brings out his inner Bigot: 1) I believe that human sexuality is non-linear. While there are certainly a great many people who are very firmly homosexual or heterosexual, there just as surely

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread aclipscomb
Jeffrey Miller asked: Are we as a population representative in terms of sexuality distribution? Does Brin-L have any openly GLBT members (excepting myself, of course)? *raises hand way back in the corner* Right here. Bi. Adam C. Lipscomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

2004-02-17 Thread The Fool
From: Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] JDG brings out his inner Bigot: 1) I believe that human sexuality is non-linear. While there are certainly a great many people who are very firmly

Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

2004-02-17 Thread Damon Agretto
There is a place for all things. This wasn't the place. Mr. JDG's comment is offensive, and outrageous. Every person As if you've never said anything offensive... Damon. = Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Qui desiderat

Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

2004-02-17 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:58 PM Subject: Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment I know gay people, and bi-sexual people, and I can't imagine that Mr. JDG's extremist views should

Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

2004-02-17 Thread Michael Harney
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED] sarcasmGee Fool, do you think you could be any more subtle?/sarcasm There is a place for all things. This wasn't the place. Mr. JDG's comment is offensive, and outrageous. Every person who fights for

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Michael Harney
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1) I believe that human sexuality is non-linear. While there are certainly a great many people who are very firmly homosexual or heterosexual, there just as surely exists some subset of people who

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:35 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment) Jeffrey Miller asked

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Harney Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:33 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment) From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Deborah Harrell
Top-post -- Of **course** we're not average! We're clearly all _above average_! ;D Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much about my life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids (but then, I tend to think

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:23 PM Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment) Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a chart

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a chart, I'll guess ~ 95%, since I'm allowing that if I'd grown up in a radically different society I might not be 100%), single yet looking, 2 children-in-fur, 3 surrogate children-on-the-hoof...

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Deborah Harrell
Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a chart, I'll guess ~ 95%, since I'm allowing that if I'd grown up in a radically different society I might not be 100%), single yet looking, 2 children-in-fur,

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Julia Thompson
Miller, Jeffrey wrote: I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much about my life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids (but then, I tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^) Monogamous, hetero, married, kids. Insane. (I'm told it gets easier

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Damon Agretto
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids. Me too! Except changed married to engaged, and kids to none... Insane. That too (but in a different way...bwahahahaha!) Damon. = Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Qui desiderat pacem,

Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige[sic]Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 2/17/2004 6:21:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Monogamous, hetero, married, kids. monogamous hetero married kids (I have kids my kids aren't married at least not the last time I looked) ___

Re: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment

2004-02-17 Thread Michael Harney
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 2/17/2004 11:03:33 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I believe that human sexuality is non-linear. While there are certainly a great many people who are very firmly homosexual or heterosexual, there just as surely exists

RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment)

2004-02-17 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic] Amendment) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:25:23 -0800 From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1