Re: Foswiki up and running

2010-01-02 Thread Bryon Daly
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jim Sharkey  wrote:

> Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> >I'd like to hear if anybody strongly objects.
>
> I certainly do not object. It's been a long time.


I don't post much myself these days, but I'd let him back on.  But those who
were primarily aggreived should probably have more say, if they are still
around.

IIRC he posted Julia's contact info online... perhaps it wouldn't be
unreasonable to ask him to agree to refrain from such things in the future.

-bryon
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Foswiki up and running

2010-01-02 Thread Jim Sharkey
Nick Arnett wrote:

>I'd like to hear if anybody strongly objects.

I certainly do not object.  It's been a long time.

Jim



Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here!
Weight Loss Program
http://tagline.excite.com/c?cp=POPbXRwTCm9nQDOwbJInyQAAKZT738qPhjQFbf9pb8pfqpVcAAYAAADNAAAEUkbztS0=___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



RE: Foswiki up and running

2009-12-31 Thread Gary Nunn
> And... a blast from the past, pasted below.  I'll let whoever emerge 
> as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond.  As usual, 
> I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only intervene directly 
> as a last resort.


I haven't participated here for a while, but I do still read the list daily
and keep up on current events.

I don't have an opinion either way as to the collaboration issue (I'm not
familiar enough the projects), but if anyone's interested in my opinion
regarding Jeroen rejoining Brin-L, I say bury the past and invite him back.
It's been a long time.

Gary




___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Foswiki up and running

2009-12-31 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 31 Dec 2009 at 13:07, Nick Arnett wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Trent Shipley  wrote:
> 
> >
> > > And... a blast from the past, pasted below.  I'll let whoever emerge
> > > as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond.  As
> > > usual, I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only
> > > intervene directly as a last resort.
> > >
> > > Nick
> > >
> >
> > It's been a sufficiently long banishment.
> >
> 
> I'm inclined to agree, but I'd like to hear if anybody strongly objects.

I've been on Another List with him for some years and there hasn't 
been any interaction which was even so much as impolite between us on 
there. No objections from me.

AndrewC

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Foswiki up and running

2009-12-31 Thread Trent Shipley
Nick Arnett wrote:

> Got Foswiki installed here:
>
> http://nickarnett.net/sfwiki
>
Hi Nick, check out:
http://n2.nabble.com/Foswiki-f2555947.html

It's the archive for Foswiki discuss after March 2009.  I have a thread
near the top.  The gist is that if we are lucky we could run into a
problem scaling out.
As A.C. said there are webs and subwebs, as near as I can tell these
correspond to directories.  The performance of a web/directory degrades
noticeably by about 10 entries by which time searches take 5-10
seconds each.  Furthermore, these companies wind up having to use Google
search engines on their sites.  This limit is an area that is attracting
a lot of effort however.

One way around this limit is to have subwebs.  This gives your wiki a
hierarchical structure.  So for an encyclopedia you would perhaps have
mutually exclusive horror and superhero webs.   Now do we put Buffy the
Vampire Slayer entries in horror or superhero?  For an encyclopedia type
site, hierarchy is Bad.

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Foswiki up and running

2009-12-31 Thread Nick Arnett
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Trent Shipley  wrote:

>
> > And... a blast from the past, pasted below.  I'll let whoever emerge
> > as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond.  As
> > usual, I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only
> > intervene directly as a last resort.
> >
> > Nick
> >
>
> It's been a sufficiently long banishment.
>

I'm inclined to agree, but I'd like to hear if anybody strongly objects.


>
> The watchamacallit wiki is a new project and we can hardly keep him out
> there for behavior here.
>

I agree completely with that.

Nick


>
>
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Foswiki up and running

2009-12-31 Thread Trent Shipley

> And... a blast from the past, pasted below.  I'll let whoever emerge
> as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond.  As
> usual, I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only
> intervene directly as a last resort.
>
> Nick
>

It's been a sufficiently long banishment.  Although, if we should have
occasion to discuss Israel, Palestinians, Jews, or Jewishness, I doubt
his opinions have changed and I doubt he will refrain from expressing them.

The watchamacallit wiki is a new project and we can hardly keep him out
there for behavior here.  If we keep conversation about that here for a
while we almost have to let Jeroen into Brin-L at this stage.

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Foswiki up and running

2009-12-31 Thread Richard Baker
Nick said:

> And... a blast from the past, pasted below.  I'll let whoever emerge as the 
> folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond.  As usual, I'm 
> inclined to let the community choose and will only intervene directly as a 
> last resort.

I don't know whether I get any kind of vote, but if I did I'd vote to let 
Jeroen back. People, situations and communities can all change quite a lot in 
six years, and everything seems much more relaxed here than it did back then.

Rich
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Foswiki up and running

2009-12-31 Thread Nick Arnett
Got Foswiki installed here:

http://nickarnett.net/sfwiki

As I mentioned before, we can point a domain name to that directory when
this project decides to announce itself.

Interested parties, register thyselves and I'll make the appropriate,
involved people into administrators.

And... a blast from the past, pasted below.  I'll let whoever emerge as the
folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond.  As usual, I'm
inclined to let the community choose and will only intervene directly as a
last resort.

Nick

*Hi Nick!*

*I’ve heard from Matt Lundstrom and Alberto Monteiro that Brin-L is
discussing setting up a Brin Wiki, after someone noticed that some troll is
very busy trying to remove “All that is Brin” from Wikipedia. Marvellous
idea (the wiki, not the removal); in fact, a few years back Matt and I were
playing with the idea of turning the Alliance for Progress Encyclopedia into
a wiki format as well. The enthusiasm and disk space were there, lack of
time put the idea on the back burner.*

*With both Brin-L and the A4PE Team playing with the same (or at least a
similar) idea, I see opportunity for cooperation – although a part of the
A4PE isn’t canonical but fan fic and should probably not be included in the
Brin Wiki. Would you mind burying old grieves in the past, lift that ban you
imposed six years ago, and let me join again? Both Matt and I would like to
contribute to the Brin Wiki project, being on the list would make it a lot
easier.*

*Oh, BTW, in case you’re looking for it: now that Yahoo!GeoCities (former
host of the A4PE) has gone the way of the dodo, the A4PE is now hosted by my
company, available for all to see at http://www.brin-l.com/a4p. There’s
still over 3.5 GB of disk space available for a Brin Wiki on my server, so
if Brin-L needs a (free-of-charge) place for the Brin Wiki then it’s
available.*

*Greetings from NL/BE, and already the best wishes for 2010.*

*Jeroen van Baardwijk*
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com