I'll be a monkey's uncle . . .
Psych Prof Advocates Human/Chimp Hybrids But only to Offend Christians http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jul/06072803.html -- Ronn! :) Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot remain in the cradle forever. -- Konstantin E. Tsiolkovskiy ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: I'll be a monkey's uncle . . .
In a message dated 7/29/2006 7:26:42 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Psych Prof Advocates Human/Chimp Hybrids – But only to Offend Christians Or French waiters, New York City cab drivers, marine drill serjeants, and all third string defensive linesmen. Vilyehm (First and second string are always gorilla hybrids.) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: I'll be a monkey's uncle . . .
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Psych Prof Advocates Human/Chimp Hybrids But only to Offend Christians http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jul/06072803.html Creating a living and possibly sentient being just in order to tick someone off strikes me as pretty low. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: I'll be a monkey's uncle . . .
At 10:30 PM Saturday 7/29/2006, PAT MATHEWS wrote: Creating a living and possibly sentient being just in order to tick someone off strikes me as pretty low. How many women have gone through with a pregnancy to trap a man? -- Ronn! :) Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot remain in the cradle forever. -- Konstantin E. Tsiolkovskiy ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: I'll be a monkey's uncle . . .
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Subject: RE: I'll be a monkey's uncle . . . Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:40:02 -0500 At 10:30 PM Saturday 7/29/2006, PAT MATHEWS wrote: Creating a living and possibly sentient being just in order to tick someone off strikes me as pretty low. How many women have gone through with a pregnancy to trap a man? Gone through with? You mean they were already pregnant and should have had the decency to let him off the hook by having an abortion? The ones who get deliberately pregant for that purpose - that's pretty low, too. Not quite as low as doing so to tick him off! (Or him getting her pregant to show that b#$!%. Ripped from the headlines.) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: I'll be a monkey's uncle . . .
Ronn - let me make this really simple. A human being is an end in himself or herself, not a means to another's ends. Yes, I understand the bit about having a child becaue you need an heir. That may or may not be borderline. Other than that - to create one for any other end than that you want and need one - no. And anyone who does should be judged the legal parent of the child - yes, indeed, Dr. Frankenstien. You created him; he's legally your son; and no, you can NOT disinherit him. evil grin and witch-like chortling. http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/ From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Subject: RE: I'll be a monkey's uncle . . . Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:40:02 -0500 At 10:30 PM Saturday 7/29/2006, PAT MATHEWS wrote: Creating a living and possibly sentient being just in order to tick someone off strikes me as pretty low. How many women have gone through with a pregnancy to trap a man? -- Ronn! :) Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot remain in the cradle forever. -- Konstantin E. Tsiolkovskiy ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
