Re: Foswiki up and running
Nick Arnett wrote: I'd like to hear if anybody strongly objects. I certainly do not object. It's been a long time. Jim Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here! Weight Loss Program http://tagline.excite.com/c?cp=POPbXRwTCm9nQDOwbJInyQAAKZT738qPhjQFbf9pb8pfqpVcAAYAAADNAAAEUkbztS0=___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Foswiki up and running
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jim Sharkey templar...@excite.com wrote: Nick Arnett wrote: I'd like to hear if anybody strongly objects. I certainly do not object. It's been a long time. I don't post much myself these days, but I'd let him back on. But those who were primarily aggreived should probably have more say, if they are still around. IIRC he posted Julia's contact info online... perhaps it wouldn't be unreasonable to ask him to agree to refrain from such things in the future. -bryon ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Foswiki up and running
Nick said: And... a blast from the past, pasted below. I'll let whoever emerge as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond. As usual, I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only intervene directly as a last resort. I don't know whether I get any kind of vote, but if I did I'd vote to let Jeroen back. People, situations and communities can all change quite a lot in six years, and everything seems much more relaxed here than it did back then. Rich ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Foswiki up and running
And... a blast from the past, pasted below. I'll let whoever emerge as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond. As usual, I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only intervene directly as a last resort. Nick It's been a sufficiently long banishment. Although, if we should have occasion to discuss Israel, Palestinians, Jews, or Jewishness, I doubt his opinions have changed and I doubt he will refrain from expressing them. The watchamacallit wiki is a new project and we can hardly keep him out there for behavior here. If we keep conversation about that here for a while we almost have to let Jeroen into Brin-L at this stage. ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Foswiki up and running
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Trent Shipley tship...@deru.com wrote: And... a blast from the past, pasted below. I'll let whoever emerge as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond. As usual, I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only intervene directly as a last resort. Nick It's been a sufficiently long banishment. I'm inclined to agree, but I'd like to hear if anybody strongly objects. The watchamacallit wiki is a new project and we can hardly keep him out there for behavior here. I agree completely with that. Nick ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Foswiki up and running
Nick Arnett wrote: Got Foswiki installed here: http://nickarnett.net/sfwiki Hi Nick, check out: http://n2.nabble.com/Foswiki-f2555947.html It's the archive for Foswiki discuss after March 2009. I have a thread near the top. The gist is that if we are lucky we could run into a problem scaling out. As A.C. said there are webs and subwebs, as near as I can tell these correspond to directories. The performance of a web/directory degrades noticeably by about 10 entries by which time searches take 5-10 seconds each. Furthermore, these companies wind up having to use Google search engines on their sites. This limit is an area that is attracting a lot of effort however. One way around this limit is to have subwebs. This gives your wiki a hierarchical structure. So for an encyclopedia you would perhaps have mutually exclusive horror and superhero webs. Now do we put Buffy the Vampire Slayer entries in horror or superhero? For an encyclopedia type site, hierarchy is Bad. ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Foswiki up and running
On 31 Dec 2009 at 13:07, Nick Arnett wrote: On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Trent Shipley tship...@deru.com wrote: And... a blast from the past, pasted below. I'll let whoever emerge as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond. As usual, I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only intervene directly as a last resort. Nick It's been a sufficiently long banishment. I'm inclined to agree, but I'd like to hear if anybody strongly objects. I've been on Another List with him for some years and there hasn't been any interaction which was even so much as impolite between us on there. No objections from me. AndrewC ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
RE: Foswiki up and running
And... a blast from the past, pasted below. I'll let whoever emerge as the folks who lead the wiki project decide how to respond. As usual, I'm inclined to let the community choose and will only intervene directly as a last resort. I haven't participated here for a while, but I do still read the list daily and keep up on current events. I don't have an opinion either way as to the collaboration issue (I'm not familiar enough the projects), but if anyone's interested in my opinion regarding Jeroen rejoining Brin-L, I say bury the past and invite him back. It's been a long time. Gary ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
