On Behalf Of Kevin Tarr
Just wondering about three commercials on the telly. The
first is the new
subway campaign where the people can do something bad because
they had
subway for lunch. Specifically the one that ends with the man
washing the
car in the cheerleader outfit. Is the
Gary Nunn wrote:
Of the three that you mentioned, the cheerleader one is the only
one I have seen. I believe the woman is his wife. I love this
commercial. The car crunch sound at the end is a nice touch. :-)
See, I'm pretty sure that's his daughter. Unless he's far wealthier than the
At 06:46 PM 10/19/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Gary Nunn wrote:
Of the three that you mentioned, the cheerleader one is the only
one I have seen. I believe the woman is his wife. I love this
commercial. The car crunch sound at the end is a nice touch. :-)
See, I'm pretty sure that's his daughter.
Kevin Tarr wrote:
Is that a prejudice saying that he has to be wealthy to have such a
woman as a wife?
Perhaps if you restate is saying such a man to have such a woman it might be more
accurate. I would argue that it's not absolutely necessary, but it certainly would
better his bargaining
Jim Sharkey wrote:
See, I'm pretty sure that's his daughter. Unless he's far wealthier
than the commercial suggests, there's just no way an ugly, old,
bald guy is getting a woman that much younger than him.
But that's the whole point of the commercial: he may be poor, ugly,
old and bald,
Jim Sharkey wrote:
Gary Nunn wrote:
Of the three that you mentioned, the cheerleader one is the only
one I have seen. I believe the woman is his wife. I love this
commercial. The car crunch sound at the end is a nice touch. :-)
See, I'm pretty sure that's his daughter. Unless he's far
Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 06:46 PM 10/19/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Gary Nunn wrote:
Of the three that you mentioned, the cheerleader one is the only
one I have seen. I believe the woman is his wife. I love this
commercial. The car crunch sound at the end is a nice touch. :-)
See, I'm pretty
