From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scouted: House Bans Patents on Human Beings
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 03:31:30 +
Travis Edmunds wrote:
You may say that it's not justified. Fine
Travis Edmunds wrote:
If one of my kids needed some special organ (say, the heart) and it
happened that the only one available (compatibility, etc) was _yours_,
I might try to kill you to harvest that organ.
That doesn't make it right.
Disclaimer: I didn't render my own opinions in my
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Scouted: House Bans Patents on Human Beings
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:07:40 -0500
Not sure if anyone out there disagrees with this law, but if so, I 'd be
interested in hearing
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Scouted: House Bans Patents on Human Beings
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:15:58 -0600
At 05:02 PM 12/22/03, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Scouted: House Bans Patents on Human Beings
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:35:26 -0600
I know. But then you know I have to point out the obvious
Travis Edmunds wrote:
You may say that it's not justified. Fine. But what if you or your child or
some other loved one of yours, contracted a life threatening affliction,
and the only means of saving yours or the other person's life was to
harvest a human embryo (which you consider to be
Not sure if anyone out there disagrees with this law, but if so, I 'd be
interested in hearing from you.
JDG
http://www.lifenews.com/bio175.html
Pro-life groups say a patent is a government-conferred property right and
human beings shouldn't be considered property.
The provision would ban
