Shaking

2010-04-30 Thread Kanandarqu


Hi everyone, 
 
Just to stir things up, I have to admit I had a good chuckle and a WTG "in  
your face" religious moment reading about "Boobquake" and I figure it might 
be a  "in play topic" with a bit of self moderated tongue in cheek.  
 
I am thinking I am having a IF moment- Ironic feminism- kinda like women  
who use the words "broad" or "chick" toward a purpose of trying to reclaim  
the power of the words.  I am a poor spokesperson for feminism, but I sure  
do love a good bit of mockery and sarcasm.
 
Dee
 
For the non "Mericans, here is an exerpt from CBS-
 
**
 
 
CBS)  A senior Iranian cleric's controversial theory that  
immodestly-dressed women can cause earthquakes is being put to the test, thanks 
 to an 
Indiana student and 80,000 accomplices. 

_Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi was quoted in Iranian media last  week_ 
(http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/19/world/main6411387.shtml)  as saying 
that 
"Many women who do not dress modestly ...  lead young men astray, corrupt 
their chastity and spread adultery in society,  which (consequently) 
increases earthquakes." 

Jennifer McCreight, a  Purdue University senior majoring in genetics and 
evolution, told CBS  Affiliate WLFI correspondent Niccole Caan she wanted to 
take a light-hearted  approach to field testing the cleric's scientific 
theory. 

She's asking  women to dress immodestly on Monday, April 26, so that any 
discernable effects  upon the Earth's tectonic plates can be traced. 

"I want to do good  science to counter the bad science this cleric had 
performed," she told  WLFI. "I'm going to compare the frequency and severity of 
the earthquakes  on the 26th to earthquakes previous to that, and see if 
there is a statistical  difference." 

She admitted her experiment, dubbed Boobquake, was  "light-hearted 
mockery," but had no idea it would take off the way it has.  

Thinking the Boobquake guest list would be limited to a small circle of  
friends, McCreight soon found news of the event, _posted on a Facebook page 
devoted to Boobquake_ 
(http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boobquake/115608248460905) , had  gone viral, 
with many willing to participate in the experiment. 

By  Friday, more than 80,000 women had signed up, adding even more heft to 
the  scientific calculus. 

McCreight did not dictate what to wear - only that  women should dress as 
immodestly as they feel comfortable doing. 

"I'm  not forcing people to dress differently than they would be," 
McCreight told  WLFI. "Even showing an ankle to some people would be immodest, 
so 
you can  interpret that however you wish." 

For the record, on Monday _she wore a tank  top_ 
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-dxg8gReUqE/S9WAyIaInJI/AyM/lRH_4GbaSAk/s1600/Picture+002.jpg)
 .
 
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Shaking!

2007-11-01 Thread Charlie Bell

On 02/11/2007, at 1:16 PM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
>>
>
>
> This is the last message I have received from Brin-L . . . including
> at least one message I sent to the list which has not shown
> up.  Apparently Dan broke the list somehow . . . :(


It's just quiet.

Charlie.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Shaking!

2007-11-01 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 02:32 PM Wednesday 10/31/2007, Dan Minettte wrote:
>I resigned my roadrunner account on brin-l to Comcast, and haven't seen the
>email.  I'm resending from my hotmail account.  If this appears first, then
>Comcast isn't working yet.


This is the last message I have received from Brin-L . . . including 
at least one message I sent to the list which has not shown 
up.  Apparently Dan broke the list somehow . . . :(


-- Ronn!  :)



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Shaking!

2007-10-31 Thread Dan Minettte
I resigned my roadrunner account on brin-l to Comcast, and haven't seen the
email.  I'm resending from my hotmail account.  If this appears first, then
Comcast isn't working yet.

> -Original Message-
> From: Dan M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:31 PM
> To: 'Killer Bs Discussion'
> Subject: RE: Shaking!
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On
> > Behalf Of Doug
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:14 AM
> > To: Killer Bs Discussion
> > Subject: Re: Shaking!
> >
> > Nick wrote:
> >
> > > We have a clock that fell off our mantle, battery dropped out, so it's
> > > frozen at the time of the quake.
> >
> > It was very strong here.  I'm about a mile and a half away from Alum
> Rock
> > Road.  There was an initial rumble rumble rumble and then a sharp crack
> > that set the house to swaying pretty good.  Then there was a bit more
> > shaking and it continued to vibrate for perhaps 30 seconds.  Several
> > things fell of shelves and broke and a plant fell off a counter and made
> a
> > big mess.
> 
> My daughter, Beth, was backstage at the San Francisco Conservatory of
> Music when the quake hit.  She didn't even notice.
> 
> Dan M.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Shaking!

2007-10-31 Thread Dan M


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Doug
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:14 AM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Shaking!
> 
> Nick wrote:
> 
> > We have a clock that fell off our mantle, battery dropped out, so it's
> > frozen at the time of the quake.
> 
> It was very strong here.  I'm about a mile and a half away from Alum Rock
> Road.  There was an initial rumble rumble rumble and then a sharp crack
> that set the house to swaying pretty good.  Then there was a bit more
> shaking and it continued to vibrate for perhaps 30 seconds.  Several
> things fell of shelves and broke and a plant fell off a counter and made a
> big mess.

My daughter, Beth, was backstage at the San Francisco Conservatory of Music
when the quake hit.  She didn't even notice.  

Dan M. 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shaking!

2007-10-31 Thread Dave Land
On Oct 31, 2007, at 6:20 AM, Julia Thompson wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Nick Arnett wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Answer the door tonight dressed as a giant lime jello.
>>>
>>> ...still shaking from yesterday.
>>
>> That might attract Dave Land... he likes lime jello.
>
> Would this be a bad thing?  :)

Strange synchronicity: I just had a chat with a coworker who lives very
near the epicenter. She had *just* put jello in the fridge before the
quake hit, and she didn't remember that she had done so until about
2-1/2 hours after the quake... Plenty of time for the spilled jello to
set up...

I have no idea what flavor of Jello it was. For the sake of the
synchronicity, I declare it to have been lime jello.

Dave

PS: Whether it would be a good or bad thing for someone to answer the
door dressed as a giant lime jello still shaking from yesterday would
depend on who you are. I can think of some people I would really not
like to see dressed up as lime jello...

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shaking!

2007-10-31 Thread Julia Thompson


On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Nick Arnett wrote:

> On 10/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Answer the door tonight dressed as a giant lime jello.
>>
>> ...still shaking from yesterday.
>
>
> That might attract Dave Land... he likes lime jello.

Would this be a bad thing?  :)

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shaking!

2007-10-31 Thread Dave Land
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Doug wrote:

> Nick wrote:
>
>> We have a clock that fell off our mantle, battery dropped out, so  
>> it's
>> frozen at the time of the quake.
>>
>> Cindy, the dog and I were right by the front door... really wondering
>> if it was going to stop before getting bigger, which was just how the
>> big '89 quake, Loma Prieta, was for me... except it kept getting
>> bigger. Lasted a long time here -- about 20 seconds, I guess.
>
> This was the most violent quake we've had since the '89 shaker and its
> aftershocks, but I knew it wasn't as big as that one.  I estimated  
> it at
> 6.0 imediately after it hit, but I didn't realize how close it was.

I was in Cupertino, on stage rehearsing a play when it hit. The tech
sitting against a wall at the back of the hall noticed it first.

It was accompanied by a low thrumming sound that I am still convinced
was a truck or other vehicle idling outside, but others heard it and
thought it might have been the way our 50-year-old church building was
responding to the quake.

When Peggy finally got through to my cell phone, she put Ryan on -- he
was seriously freaked by it. At 10 years old, this is his first big
quake, and apparently, it was a scary one here at home. He claims that
our 27-inch TV nearly fell over on him, which I find hard to believe,
and Peggy wasn't in the room at the time, so who knows?

Later, around 9:30 (an hour and a half after the quake) he was still
nervously chatty about it, but as he drifted off to sleep around 10, he
said that it was "really cool, but scary."

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shaking!

2007-10-30 Thread Doug
Nick wrote:

> We have a clock that fell off our mantle, battery dropped out, so it's
> frozen at the time of the quake.
>
>
> Cindy, the dog and I were right by the front door... really wondering if  
> it was going to stop before getting bigger, which was just how the big  
> '89
> quake, Loma Prieta, was for me... except it kept getting bigger.  Lasted  
> a long time here -- about 20 seconds, I guess.


It was very strong here.  I'm about a mile and a half away from Alum Rock  
Road.  There was an initial rumble rumble rumble and then a sharp crack  
that set the house to swaying pretty good.  Then there was a bit more  
shaking and it continued to vibrate for perhaps 30 seconds.  Several  
things fell of shelves and broke and a plant fell off a counter and made a  
big mess.

This was the most violent quake we've had since the '89 shaker and its  
aftershocks, but I knew it wasn't as big as that one.  I estimated it at  
6.0 imediately after it hit, but I didn't realize how close it was.

So much for animals predicting quakes.  I had two dogs and three birds in  
close proximity and if any of them had a clue it was going to happen they  
didn't let on.

Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shaking!

2007-10-30 Thread Nick Arnett
On 10/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
>
> Answer the door tonight dressed as a giant lime jello.
>
> ...still shaking from yesterday.


That might attract Dave Land... he likes lime jello.

So... they're saying that this was on the Calaveras Fault, which was
regularly producing small to moderate quakes in the past, but hadn't done so
in about 20 years.

We have a clock that fell off our mantle, battery dropped out, so it's
frozen at the time of the quake.


Cindy, the dog and I were right by the front door... really wondering if it
was going to stop before getting bigger, which was just how the big '89
quake, Loma Prieta, was for me... except it kept getting bigger.  Lasted a
long time here -- about 20 seconds, I guess.

Nick

-- 
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shaking!

2007-10-30 Thread Medievalbk
 
In a message dated 10/30/2007 8:09:00 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Just had  a pretty good earthquake here...  but the lights are still  on.

Nick



Answer the door tonight dressed as a giant lime jello.
 
...still shaking from yesterday.
 
Vilyehm



** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shaking!

2007-10-30 Thread Nick Arnett
Here's the map with prelim info:

http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/122-37.html

On 10/30/07, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> > Just had a pretty good earthquake here...  but the lights are still on.
> >
> > Nick
>
> Glad you're still illuminated.  :)
>
> Julia
>
> ___
> http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
>



-- 
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Shaking... 5.6

2007-10-30 Thread Nick Arnett
Prelim magnitude 5.6 (moderate quake) and it was about 13 miles from my
house... about 8.5 miles from Dave Land's house.

This one just kept going... we had enough time to get out by the front door
and think about it... wondered if we still had a chimney -- we do.  A few
things fell off shelves.

Scary... after being in the 1989 big one.  I don't need to experience any
more of these.

Nick

-- 
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shaking!

2007-10-30 Thread Julia Thompson

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Nick Arnett wrote:

> Just had a pretty good earthquake here...  but the lights are still on.
>
> Nick

Glad you're still illuminated.  :)

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Shaking!

2007-10-30 Thread Nick Arnett
Just had a pretty good earthquake here...  but the lights are still on.

Nick

-- 
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l