Re: Status Notification
Nick -- Nope. I've never seen them before. Sorry this is so late. We're at Disneyland and I'm getting my email late... Jo Anne evens...@hevanet.com ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: NightOwls Demand Equal Rights!
On 19 Sep 2011, at 17:57, Dan Minette wrote: > Nick wrote: > >> That's just weird. Could you check the archive page now and then and let >> me know if there seems to be any pattern to what's not arriving? > > I've noticed that, just in the last few days, I don't see my own posts. Most > of the time I get my posts just like everyone elses. > Same here! Did get my last post though… As for a pattern to what I'm not getting: Last week: I've gotten some messages from every thread, no pattern there. And I've NOT gotten the messages from Wayne Eddy, Dan Minnette, Ronn! (only some), Pat (one) and Doug P. <> This week: I did get Dan't reply to "ADMIN:etc" but not Pat's reply to "Testing" (maybe that one's on the way). Ticia ',:) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
RE: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: NightOwls Demand Equal Rights!
Nick wrote: >That's just weird. Could you check the archive page now and then and let >me know if there seems to be any pattern to what's not arriving? I've noticed that, just in the last few days, I don't see my own posts. Most of the time I get my posts just like everyone elses. Dan M. ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Ticia wrote: > > > > Nick I'm not getting all Brin-L messages?! I never got the thread below > (Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!), checkend my spambox but they're not > there! > > That's just weird. Could you check the archive page now and then and let me know if there seems to be any pattern to what's not arriving? Nick ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
On 19 Sep 2011, at 01:37, Nick Arnett wrote: > Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this. Shouldn't happen. I'll > figure it out and stop it. > > Nick > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ronn! Blankenship > wrote: > Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) > receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do > something about it? > > TIA! > > > > (Quoting it in its entirety with full headers in case that info is of help to > anyone . . . ) > > <> Nick I'm not getting all Brin-L messages?! I never got the thread below (Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!), checkend my spambox but they're not there! > > At 01:17 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Matt Grimaldi wrote: > Ticia wrote: > > > B-Society: proposing an alternative to the 9-5 society, > > taking into account the needs of the 25% of us who are > > evening types (night owls). > > That sounds good! If there was a chapter in L.A., I would want to join! > > -- Matt > > > > They meet at Joe's sushi bar downtown starting at 8:00 AM. > > > . . . ronn! :) > > "Sunrise is Nature's way of telling you it's bedtime." > I know there'd be kindred spirits on here! There's some preliminary reseach linking creativity and high IQ with eveningness (though I personally know some exceptions to that so it's not conditional or anything ;)) Ticia ',:) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Status Notification
On 19 Sep 2011, at 06:00, Jo Anne wrote: > Nick -- I don't get it, and I'm on the digest... > > Hi Ticia THREE kids, you and Julia are now the mothers of the list. > Is Julia still here?? > > Jo Anne > Crone of the List > Hi Jo Anne Even better: I also had twins, just like Julia! >:) Eldest is now 7 and the twins are 3. Totally exhausting. Am sitting here on the couch with my laptop recovering from having to drag them out of bed waay too early (they're evening folk like me) and into their clothes (not their sister's) and stuff some food in them and then out with daddy off to school & daycare (he had to make two runs today as the eldest would have been late for the 8.30 deadline) Good thing I can work from home so often… Ticia ',:) Mother of the List ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Okay, I removed the problem address... shouldn't happen any more. Nick ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Me neither. Hi Ticia, good to hear from you. Doug On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Matt Grimaldi wrote: > I DON'T get such messages when sending on the list. > -- Matt > > > ___ > http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com > > > ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Status Notification
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Jo Anne wrote: > Nick -- I don't get it, and I'm on the digest... > Ah, it probably only goes to those who post... did you get one after you wrote this message? Nick ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Status Notification
Nick -- I don't get it, and I'm on the digest... Hi Ticia THREE kids, you and Julia are now the mothers of the list. Is Julia still here?? Jo Anne Crone of the List ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
I DON'T get such messages when sending on the list. -- Matt___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
RE: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Well, I got it, and since I didn't see my Reply message to the list pop up, I figured there was smeting wrong and it wouldn;t take my reply. http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/ > Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:00:42 -0500 > To: brin-l@mccmedia.com > From: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net > Subject: Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: > Night Owls Demand Equal Rights! > > At 06:37 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Nick Arnett wrote: > >Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this. > > > Yep. I get it every time I send a message to the list, and it sounds > like everybody else does, too . . . > > > > Shouldn't happen. I'll figure it out and stop it. > > > Thanks! > > > . . . ronn! :) > > > > ___ > http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com > ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
At 06:37 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Nick Arnett wrote: Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this. Yep. I get it every time I send a message to the list, and it sounds like everybody else does, too . . . Shouldn't happen. I'll figure it out and stop it. Thanks! . . . ronn! :) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this. Shouldn't happen. I'll figure it out and stop it. Nick On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ronn! Blankenship < ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) > receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do > something about it? > > TIA! > > > > (Quoting it in its entirety with full headers in case that info is of help > to anyone . . . ) > > > At 01:50 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, postmas...@cenit.de wrote: > >> X-Apparently-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net via 67.195.15.74; Sun, 18 >> Sep 2011 11:50:22 -0700 >> Received-SPF: none (domain of fgateway09.isp.att.net does not designate >> permitted sender hosts) >> X-YMailISG: RzwF44oWLDu8LZBgzXsfOTA5LUtnda**FOMzyYUK3vJhsZ3THi >> Xs2ICe3wr8v2Rb1eEvRHKhbirhpihi**KzA3SxZ5r8sG.T7W2fB0z8N_vcUQLa >> bX9j8PKcUlzUiZCa_**YPoAZeWZu3To9B6T23_oJJs.9j0.**56BfJILojsBKBI2 >> pH2Q1wkGnmuVkhtZFg_as_**f7QUTIsUsnmQQCHzxFrH5ARd_nZ._**FJVDo85xK >> 5AWKZ4DlOTvNR9uz94k1EgjZFrcLYN**4796s1UKBoujqt6XNI.gRth_CNVtFw >> s7SdPMkYq_**8lBRJwbSZ1LZrn7DNPVvZxcojIipWu**th5zsJaP1ipt2LnSRUN3 >> EgsjmyMeEd6HmKXWvNuuZXxlMHzSZ2**F5FjO2JytKGw72QSVGPdQ1F.CjfDOt >> AV793n5CvHDlk6qmzeNthNTBbzkwbo**iE23GOlRt2O8KpZ6cFQHEtvZuJuBtt >> FjCcAvWYzONx1MWxtPEKwricOz7Qwg**hdC2a2qAAkAAV5.g-- >> X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4] >> Authentication-Results: mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=cenit.de; >> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=cenit.de; dkim=neutral (no sig) >> Received: from 207.115.11.39 (EHLO fgateway09.isp.att.net) >> (207.115.11.39) >> by mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:50:20 >> -0700 >> Received: from cenit.de (ns2.cenit.de[193.188.158.4]) >> by isp.att.net (frfwmxc09) with ESMTP >> id <20110918185019M0900jhlfke>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:50:19 + >> X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4] >> Received: from >> mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.**com<http://mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.com>([10.0.2.156]) >>by ns2.cenit.de (cenit.de [192.168.232.3]) >>(MDaemon PRO v9.6.3) >>with ESMTP id md50003484517.msg >>for >> >; >> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200 >> Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by >> mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.**com<http://mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.com>(8.13.8/8.13.8) >>id p8IIo9BI023663 for >> >; >> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 >> From: postmas...@cenit.de >> To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net >> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 0001 - 80040546 >> Message-ID: >> >> > >> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) >> Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; >>boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_**01CC68D12B729BBE1B70exf?** >> de02.de.ceni" >> VBR-Info: md=cenit.de; mc=all; mv=vbr.emailcertification.org; >> X-Spam-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200 >>(not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) >> X-MDRemoteIP: 10.0.2.156 >> X-Return-Path: >> X-Envelope-From: >> X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net >> X-MDAV-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:57 +0200 >> >> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. >> >> Delivery to the following recipients failed. >> >> a.freib...@cenit.de >> >> >> >> >> Reporting-MTA: >> dns;exf-de02.de.cenit-group.**com<http://exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com> >> Received-From-MTA: >> dns;mailgateway01.de.cenit-**group.com<http://mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com> >> Arrival-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 >> >> Final-Recipient: rfc822;a.freib...@cenit.de >> Action: failed >> Status: 5.1.1 >> >> Received: from >> mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.**com<http://mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com>([10.0.2.155]) >> by >> exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); >>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 >> Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by >> mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.**com<http://mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com>(8.13.8/8.13.8) >>id p8IIo8e0008854 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 >> 20:50:08 +0200 >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) >> X-Spam-Level: >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,REPTO_QUOTE_** >> QUALCOMM >>
Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
At 04:32 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Ticia wrote: And why do I keep getting this? On Sep 18, 2011, at 11:02 PM, postmas...@cenit.de wrote: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. a.freib...@cenit.de Without the extra "e" it reminds me of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Friberg (And here comes yet another automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.) . . . ronn! :) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
At 04:48 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Ronn! Blankenship wrote: Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do something about it? I see Ticia also wondered the same pretty thing at much the same moment, and was nice enough to not try to be as "helpful" as I was . . . :( And apparently Dan answered my question in the negative . . . :(:( Oh, well . . . . . . ronn! :) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do something about it? TIA! (Quoting it in its entirety with full headers in case that info is of help to anyone . . . ) At 01:50 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, postmas...@cenit.de wrote: X-Apparently-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net via 67.195.15.74; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:50:22 -0700 Received-SPF: none (domain of fgateway09.isp.att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-YMailISG: RzwF44oWLDu8LZBgzXsfOTA5LUtndaFOMzyYUK3vJhsZ3THi Xs2ICe3wr8v2Rb1eEvRHKhbirhpihiKzA3SxZ5r8sG.T7W2fB0z8N_vcUQLa bX9j8PKcUlzUiZCa_YPoAZeWZu3To9B6T23_oJJs.9j0.56BfJILojsBKBI2 pH2Q1wkGnmuVkhtZFg_as_f7QUTIsUsnmQQCHzxFrH5ARd_nZ._FJVDo85xK 5AWKZ4DlOTvNR9uz94k1EgjZFrcLYN4796s1UKBoujqt6XNI.gRth_CNVtFw s7SdPMkYq_8lBRJwbSZ1LZrn7DNPVvZxcojIipWuth5zsJaP1ipt2LnSRUN3 EgsjmyMeEd6HmKXWvNuuZXxlMHzSZ2F5FjO2JytKGw72QSVGPdQ1F.CjfDOt AV793n5CvHDlk6qmzeNthNTBbzkwboiE23GOlRt2O8KpZ6cFQHEtvZuJuBtt FjCcAvWYzONx1MWxtPEKwricOz7QwghdC2a2qAAkAAV5.g-- X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4] Authentication-Results: mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=cenit.de; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=cenit.de; dkim=neutral (no sig) Received: from 207.115.11.39 (EHLO fgateway09.isp.att.net) (207.115.11.39) by mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:50:20 -0700 Received: from cenit.de (ns2.cenit.de[193.188.158.4]) by isp.att.net (frfwmxc09) with ESMTP id <20110918185019M0900jhlfke>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:50:19 + X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4] Received: from mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.com ([10.0.2.156]) by ns2.cenit.de (cenit.de [192.168.232.3]) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.3) with ESMTP id md50003484517.msg for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200 Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) id p8IIo9BI023663 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 From: postmas...@cenit.de To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 0001 - 80040546 Message-ID: Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01CC68D12B729BBE1B70exf?de02.de.ceni" VBR-Info: md=cenit.de; mc=all; mv=vbr.emailcertification.org; X-Spam-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 10.0.2.156 X-Return-Path: X-Envelope-From: X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net X-MDAV-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:57 +0200 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. a.freib...@cenit.de Reporting-MTA: dns;exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com Arrival-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 Final-Recipient: rfc822;a.freib...@cenit.de Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Received: from mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com ([10.0.2.155]) by exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) id p8IIo8e0008854 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:08 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,REPTO_QUOTE_QUALCOMM autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Report: * -4.7 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.] * 0.0 REPTO_QUOTE_QUALCOMM Qualcomm/Eudora doesn't do quoting like this Authentication-Results: cenit.de spf=pass smtp.mail=brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com; sender-id=pass header.sender=brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com; dkim=neutral header.d=bellsouth.net (1:-4:DKIM_SIGNATURE_BAD_BUT_TESTING); Received-SPF: pass (cenit.de: domain of brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com designates 67.222.54.6 as permitted sender) x-spf-client=MDaemon.PRO.v9.6.3 receiver=cenit.de client-ip=67.222.54.6 envelope-from= helo=oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 353868.49966...@omp1006.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1316371793; bh=ArJuP1kl+YBn7HvI4uhdp18H4NmMwveC+c01OCYL1Zg=; h=Message-ID:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=XBGBkes+Ysr3I5FbkQopA/eidyZf+lmS0y0U8+ARR5mwCghWuJy3WCVMpFz5KLaEsn8o38BNWGlOU49+tnCXDyzOfuPYUvWEWIQlSdUS/h+WREd4Q3SbWqq1EAaj1/P4RPtUdqPuGpXGaztrWHMjvIzc8wJTf4+xYDpCBVHa5p0= Message-ID: <211979.73875...@smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Yahoo-Newman-Pr
RE: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Behalf Of Ticia >And why do I keep getting this? We all do when we post. There's still a few bugs in the system. :-) Dan M. ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
And why do I keep getting this? On Sep 18, 2011, at 11:02 PM, postmas...@cenit.de wrote: > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. > > Delivery to the following recipients failed. > > a.freib...@cenit.de > > > > Reporting-MTA: dns;exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com > Received-From-MTA: dns;mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com > Arrival-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:02:19 +0200 > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;a.freib...@cenit.de > Action: failed > Status: 5.1.1 > > From: Ticia > Subject: Re: Still here (Re: Br¡n: On Fracking and Earthquakes) > Date: September 18, 2011 11:02:04 PM GMT+02:00 > To: "Killer Bs \(David Brin et al\) Discussion" > Reply-To: "Killer Bs \(David Brin et al\) Discussion" > > > > On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: > >> I'm still here, of course. Recently joined NetBase as director of product >> management, so I'm busy getting up to speed. >> >> One of the data points NetBase has developed is that despite Twitter, >> Facebook, etc., the real conversation still happens, and is increasing, in >> forums, list servers, etc. Discussion tends to start in the new social >> media, but if it has any depth, it goes into venues where some depth is >> supported. >> >> I suppose if we really want to revive Brin-L, we need to have links to it >> appearing periodically in social media. >> > > I didn't know that, interesting… > > See? That's what Brin-L is still good for! For better or worse we are still > a kind of social network, with a history and conections dating back to a > previous online era… A brilliant source for information should we need it… > It'll be interesting to see how all the social networking develops in the > next few years… > > > Ticia ',:) > > > Ticia Luengo Hendriks > Co-founder and Editor-in-chief of B-Society.nl > > B-Society: proposing an alternative to the 9-5 society, taking into account > the needs of the 25% of us who are evening types (night owls). > A Broader & Better society, healthier and more productive. To Be or not to Be > a morning, day or evening type. Which are you? > > We are part of an international movement originating in Denmark: > www.b-society.org > ___ > http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com > > > ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
At 06:02 PM Wednesday 8/31/2011, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 04:53 PM Monday 8/29/2011, Jon Louis Mann wrote:
Anyone else getting these?
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
a.freib...@cenit.de
Yep.
(And I expect I'll get another one in response to this reply . . . )
. . . ronn! :)
Am I good or what? ;)
At 06:08 PM Wednesday 8/31/2011, postmas...@cenit.de wrote:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
a.freib...@cenit.de
Reporting-MTA: dns;exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com
Arrival-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 01:08:09 +0200
Final-Recipient: rfc822;a.freib...@cenit.de
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Received: from mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com ([10.0.2.155]) by
exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 01:08:09 +0200
Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com
(8.13.8/8.13.8)
id p7VN88a0027591 for ; Thu, 1 Sep
2011 01:08:08 +0200
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13)
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,REPTO_QUOTE_QUALCOMM
autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.8
X-Spam-Report:
* -4.7 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.]
* 0.0 REPTO_QUOTE_QUALCOMM Qualcomm/Eudora doesn't do
quoting like this
Authentication-Results: cenit.de
spf=pass smtp.mail=brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com;
sender-id=pass header.sender=brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com;
dkim=neutral header.d=bellsouth.net
(1:-4:DKIM_SIGNATURE_BAD_BUT_TESTING);
Received-SPF: pass (cenit.de: domain of brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com
designates 69.89.21.11 as permitted sender)
x-spf-client=MDaemon.PRO.v9.6.3
receiver=cenit.de
client-ip=69.89.21.11
envelope-from=
helo=oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 496727.43721...@omp1003.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024;
t=1314832067; bh=XR4wpQT5iIJvOdEc7cv8e/K8V7RLFzHPg7ChC1xpDVA=;
h=Message-ID:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type;
b=0yxA37CnVpMIzQFEw2OhoQlnR5pyAKqAk9imvL6Q3+ATykEYNFrismx0cexsNacB00++EI9GCV8/ikj0NjQIDCaRkhJ0uNZ/0/8Y/5461w3INgDXujxCbVp4n6JmsdjUynQKmCe2AtFFVJ5z8MqagGm6sva83d+BsaCircglV74=
Message-ID: <920497.56657...@smtp102.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: 1bhkgiMVM1mgW6bl6Lf.5PKmJVy0XVBuC8WtCOwUFP3XAZV
TN_KpENjbLI7vvBxwvsXSEvLXiFdn.hwH9d5G9.gcLhSYT0lfEqF20YLwKCy
r4h1qw75caqsBSEvmqBres1nKU_.EsOCQb7O5eeuAhCW8V62qDVQxneq4vdl
MWLCUZr1Bh2ogrgrgOEQmr92cSjRjERPrGP_XmP_9hrmRzhoZ0qdtiIXqwRu
HYI2UVitPq9N7ydCih1jqrrruYROedzVRznldBhcyeXaTDkdFoDegP8KPb06
Uyt_f6mTZ7yNkRGaBGBwwSx9UsSVSxxTgEGNNgSfAeCXBysse.8pTLFERle1
rT25TRp8u8en_DrKA6fB5.ZqbR1yHM65ilFfyUG84_OfcYGCamD61kvn880g
p.Bc.XCyElgNhSkOEIA--
X-Yahoo-SMTP: wQTBkxOswBB2ka0039gsSbdFvCOkE7H2aWnCxwx8FOwaTAYIAa1kvciLKg--
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:02:04 -0500
To: "Killer Bs \(David Brin et al\) Discussion"
From: Ronn! Blankenship
Subject: Re: Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
In-Reply-To: <1314654838.84809.yahoomailclas...@web110014.mail.gq1.yahoo .com>
References: <1314654838.84809.yahoomailclas...@web110014.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: brin-l@mccmedia.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Killer Bs \(David Brin et al\) Discussion"
List-Id: "Killer Bs \(David Brin et al\) Discussion"
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/options/brin-l_mccmedia.com>,
<mailto:brin-l-requ...@mccmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://box535.bluehost.com/pipermail/brin-l_mccmedia.com>
List-Post: <mailto:brin-l@mccmedia.com>
List-Help: <mailto:brin-l-requ...@mccmedia.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com>,
<mailto:brin-l-requ...@mccmedia.com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com
Sender: brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com
X-Identified-User: {8979:box535.bluehost.com:nickarne:mccmedia.com}
{sentby:mailman}
X-MDDK-Result: neutral (cenit.de)
X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (cenit.de)
X-MDSPF-Result: unapproved (cenit.de)
X-MDOP-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0203.4E5EBED0.0092,ss=1,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Rcpt-To: a.freib...@cenit.de
X-MDRcpt-To: a.freib...@cenit.de
X-MDRemoteIP: 69.89.21.11
X-Envelope-From: brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com
X-Spam-Processed: cenit.de, Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:54:59 +0200
X-MDAV-
Re: Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
At 04:53 PM Monday 8/29/2011, Jon Louis Mann wrote: Anyone else getting these? This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. a.freib...@cenit.de Yep. (And I expect I'll get another one in response to this reply . . . ) . . . ronn! :) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Anyone else getting these? This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. a.freib...@cenit.de Reporting-MTA: dns;exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:52:32 +0200 Final-Recipient: rfc822;a.freiberg@cenit.de Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 --- Begin Message --- > > Keith, are you with Alcor? > Yes. > > I've been thinking about it for years, but haven't > > seen anyone at cons lately to sign people up. > If you are serious about it, at least get insurance >(unless you can afford it out of pocket, and even then, > insurance is a good way to assure the funding will be > there). > > I'm curious why > > so many deceased SF authors never signed up... > They don't seem to be much more likely to sign > up than the rest of the population. > As for why, ask them, but expect > rationalizations rather then reason. > Keith I spoke to Diane and she referred me to an attorney in San Diego County, whose practice is too busy for Alcor. I'm trying to convince a friend who is an estate planner to step up. I have to write a will and make arrangements to move to Oregon in the event I get a terminal illness. If I end up with something like Alzheimer's it would be pointless to freeze a vegetable. I've met some authors who believe in the afterlife. R.A. Lafferty seemed insulted when I was surprised to learn he was a devout Catholic and did not wish to discuss it. I have a great deal of respect and admiration for him. ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com --- End Message --- ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
