At 03:55 AM 5/31/2003 -0500 The Fool wrote:
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/5954295.htm
Supreme Court further dilutes Miranda protections
BY STEPHEN HENDERSON
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - (KRT) - A splintered Supreme Court took another swipe at the
landmark Miranda
Alan Wisotsky, an attorney for Oxnard and the police officer who
interrogated Martinez, said the court's ruling was a victory for
persistent police work.
If someone had kidnapped your child, wouldn't you want police doing
everything they possibly could to get information from someone who
Uh. I don't see how the reporter reaches this conclusion. It seems
rather obvious that someone's right to not self-incriminate is not violated
if that person is never incriminated, whether by one's self or otherwise.
So, in other words, as long as you are not a suspect, the police
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:55 AM 5/31/2003 -0500 The Fool wrote:
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/5954295.htm
Supreme Court further dilutes Miranda protections
BY STEPHEN HENDERSON
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - (KRT) - A splintered
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/5954295.htm
Supreme Court further dilutes Miranda protections
BY STEPHEN HENDERSON
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - (KRT) - A splintered Supreme Court took another swipe at the
landmark Miranda ruling Tuesday, saying the right to remain
