Nick said:
> We have never "covertly moderated" anyone on this list, nor do I
> plan to do so.
That's all I wanted to know. Thanks.
Rich
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On Nov 9, 2004, at 7:32 AM, Horn, John wrote:
Behalf Of Alberto Monteiro
If I were a .nler and I wanted to break into the list to cause
trouble, I would _never_ use a .nl address. There are so many
other free emailiers, like yahoo, hotmail, etc.
Alberto has a point. I've suffered from the paranoia
- Original Message -
From: "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: RE: Technical problem, or something far worse? :o(
>Alberto has a point. I've suffered
> Behalf Of Alberto Monteiro
>
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
> >
> > In Sonja's case, well she and anyone
> > who has an .nl address suffers fallout from one certain persons
bad
> > behavior and frequent efforts to break into the list.
> >
> If I were a .nler and I wanted to break into the list to
Richard Baker wrote:
I don't recall Sonja ever saying anything that might justify her
messages being moderated for any reason other than having subscribed a
new address.
Her *address* was moderated briefly because, as she mentioned in her
next message, the list suddenly started receiving spam wit
Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> In Sonja's case, well she and anyone
> who has an .nl address suffers fallout from one certain persons bad
> behavior and frequent efforts to break into the list.
>
If I were a .nler and I wanted to break into the list to cause
trouble, I would _never_ use a .nl addr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sonja said:
Shees indeed. I'm still wondering what all this gall's got to do
with MY complaint. I'm my own person and I think I've earned my
stripes on this list for being an earnest, concerned and carefull
poster. Thus this, your behaviour towards _me_ is totally
unwarr
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: Technical problem, or something far worse? :o(
> Sonja said:
>
> > Shees inde
Sonja said:
> Shees indeed. I'm still wondering what all this gall's got to do
> with MY complaint. I'm my own person and I think I've earned my
> stripes on this list for being an earnest, concerned and carefull
> poster. Thus this, your behaviour towards _me_ is totally
> unwarrented and complet
Sorry about the time lapse in the thread, but I had to seriously cool
off before I did something rash.
Nick Arnett wrote:
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
[Various complaints snipped.]
From the e-mail that *everyone* receives when they subscribe:
"Your first messages will be moderated. If you d
At 09:35 PM 10/27/2004 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>At 27-10-04 13:24, Erik Reuter wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:35:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> > transparency and accountability.
>>
>>So, what's your name and and home address?
>
>Considering the inherent unsafety of the In
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:35:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 27-10-04 13:24, Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:35:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> transparency and accountability.
> >
> >So, what's your name and and home address?
>
> Considering the inhere
At 27-10-04 13:24, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:35:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> transparency and accountability.
So, what's your name and and home address?
Considering the inherent unsafety of the Internet, I prefer to keep my
personal information personal.
But you may
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
[Various complaints snipped.]
From the e-mail that *everyone* receives when they subscribe:
"Your first messages will be moderated. If you do not see your message
appear on the list,
give it some time, and if it still hasn't appeared in a few hours,
e-mail the a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following up on myself -- these last two
messages really came through fast!
So it is not always six hours...
That's good news.
Ruben
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
That's because they aren't moderated an
Ruben Krasnopolsky wrote:
>
> Following up on myself -- these last two
> messages really came through fast!
> So it is not always six hours...
>
> That's good news.
New subscriber posts are moderated initially anyway. Depending on when
you post and when moderators are available to vet posts, it
Following up on myself -- these last two
messages really came through fast!
So it is not always six hours...
That's good news.
Ruben
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have come to notice that several of the messages I contributed to this
list over the past few days still haven't arrived.
Is there a technical problem I should look into, or are the local
powers-that-be involved in the evil act of censoring?
No technical problems.
If i
No message of mine has been lost, but I'm getting a delay of around
six hours or so between sending email to the list and seeing it.
Maybe you can see that delay in the message headers.
I don't know if this delay is a technical problem or it is the expected
functioning of the list, maybe part of a
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:35:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> transparency and accountability.
So, what's your name and and home address?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
I have come to notice that several of the messages I contributed to this
list over the past few days still haven't arrived.
Is there a technical problem I should look into, or are the local
powers-that-be involved in the evil act of censoring?
If it's the former, it's a challenge. If it's the l
21 matches
Mail list logo
