Re: Three branch g*vernment [was: Desktop Icon Utility]

2003-01-18 Thread Julia Thompson
Doug Pensinger wrote: > > Julia Thompson wrote: > > >"Ronn! Blankenship" wrote: > > > >>"Yes, Sir! Yes, Sir! Three Bags Full!" > >> > >>(Money or (organic) fertilizer?) > >> > > > >I thought it was wool, actually. > > > Mutton gets past you. No, actually, I end up looking sheepish at times.

Re: Three branch g*vernment [was: Desktop Icon Utility]

2003-01-17 Thread Doug Pensinger
Julia Thompson wrote: "Ronn! Blankenship" wrote: At 09:43 AM 1/17/03 -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Kevin Tarr wrote: That's the point of the three branch government. Except that it seems that the USA [and Brazil, too] might become a four branch g*vernment. The "monetary" part of the g*ve

Re: Three branch g*vernment [was: Desktop Icon Utility]

2003-01-17 Thread Julia Thompson
"Ronn! Blankenship" wrote: > > At 09:43 AM 1/17/03 -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote: > >Kevin Tarr wrote: > > > > > > That's the point of the three branch government. > > > > >Except that it seems that the USA [and Brazil, too] > >might become a four branch g*vernment. The > >"monetary" part of the g

Re: Three branch g*vernment [was: Desktop Icon Utility]

2003-01-17 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 09:43 AM 1/17/03 -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Kevin Tarr wrote: > > That's the point of the three branch government. > Except that it seems that the USA [and Brazil, too] might become a four branch g*vernment. The "monetary" part of the g*vernment is almost a separate power. Some cynics m

Three branch g*vernment [was: Desktop Icon Utility]

2003-01-17 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Kevin Tarr wrote: > > That's the point of the three branch government. > Except that it seems that the USA [and Brazil, too] might become a four branch g*vernment. The "monetary" part of the g*vernment is almost a separate power. Alberto Monteiro _