At 09:59 AM 11/5/2002 -0200 Alberto Monteiro wrote:
But if you count the largest democracy by the number
of direct votes given to the President, then the title
does not belong to India, but to Brazil :-P
Actually, Lula's vote total is only the second-largest for a Presidential
candidate in
At 11:21 AM 11/5/2002 +0530 Ritu Ko wrote:
No more credit than the world gave other countries for not provoking an
unnecessary war in an unprecedentedly irrational manner, no.
Is the US *looking* for more credit than that?
Actually, I think that the US is simply looking for an end to the
Horn, John wrote:
From: Russell Chapman [mailto:rchapman;ozemail.com.au]
/8qT5dS: Permission denied
Huh?
- jmh
Confused...
Not as much as me. I posted using the same email address I have for the
last 6 years or so, but from a different SMTP server. I expected to
either see my post on
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:05:35PM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Isn't it ironic that the world's largest democracy treats every
else's concerns as a joke? ;)
Touchy! One Indian poster *possibly* does this and you generalise this to a
billion Indians???
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:20:34PM +1100, Ray Ludenia wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
One person's emoticon is another's trampoline, I always say ;)
You do? I have never heard you say this before. Can you cite some
examples? Maybe I'm deaf or haven't been paying attention.
Cite, deaf? Maybe
From: Russell Chapman [mailto:rchapman;ozemail.com.au]
/8qT5dS: Permission denied
Huh?
- jmh
Confused...
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Dan Minette wrote:
Why I can see being opposed to attacking Iraq, I'm rather
surprised by your
language.
Could you specify the exact portions please?
1) Do you think that Iraq is not in material breach of the
provisions that
ended the Gulf War? My understanding is that Iraq agreed to
Robert Seeberger wrote:
With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United
States has now
let the United Nations deliberate for nearly two months (and
counting) on
its dispute with Iraq?
g
..the US has *let* the UN deliberate...?
Interesting terminology there,
Ritu Ko wrote:
Well, the meaning was clear in any case. But the problem is that I don't
see how I could have changed the way it was perceived. I mean, I know
why I wrote the above comment, I included a 'g' and ':)' to indicate I
was joking
Would ';)' have been a better emoticon?
I've
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:21:53AM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote:
No more credit than the world gave other countries for not provoking
an unnecessary war in an unprecedentedly irrational manner, no.
Interesting terminology there, Ritu, but I guess to be expected. Isn't
it ironic that the world's
Erik Reuter wrote:
Interesting terminology there, Ritu, but I guess to be
expected. Isn't it ironic that the world's largest
democracy treats every else's concerns as a joke? ;)
Does India treat every else's concerns as a joke?
But if you count the largest democracy by the number
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:59:48AM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
But if you count the largest democracy by the number of direct votes
given to the President, then the title does not belong to India, but
to Brazil :-P
Great, next
Erik Reuter wrote:
But if you count the largest democracy by the number of
direct votes given to the President, then the title
does not belong to India, but to Brazil :-P
Great, next thing you know you'll be wanting veto power
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:19:45AM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Why one-country-one-vote? This is stupid, companheiro. It should be
one-working-class-one-vote. There would be
No, it should be one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn.
:-)
--
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:21:53AM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote:
No more credit than the world gave other countries for not provoking
an unnecessary war in an unprecedentedly irrational manner, no.
Interesting terminology there, Ritu, but I guess to be expected.
sigh
Okay.
Erik Reuter wrote:
Why one-country-one-vote? This is stupid, companheiro.
It should be one-working-class-one-vote. There would be
No, it should be
one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn.
:-)
Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
No, it should be
one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn.
:-)
Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian
girl would have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse
(3), bellybutton piercing (4), necklace (5), wristlaces (6)
/8qT5dS: Permission denied
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:56:49PM +1000, Russell Chapman wrote:
/8qT5dS: Permission denied
Ding!
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:35:33AM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian girl would
have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse (3), bellybutton
piercing (4), necklace (5), wristlaces (6) and (7), anklelaces (8)
and (9), ...
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:05:35PM +0530, Ritu Ko wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Isn't it ironic that the world's largest democracy treats every
else's concerns as a joke? ;)
chuckle
Imo, the world ought to be grateful. Look at the mess we have made of
handling our own serious concerns. ;)
In a message dated 11/5/02 5:06:06 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But if you count the largest democracy by the number of direct votes
given to the President, then the title does not belong to India, but
to Brazil :-P
William said:
The UNSC might actually work better with the men drunk and the females
naked.
Ah, the old Yeltsin-Clinton approach to statesmanship!
Rich
VFP Cheap Shot
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
In a message dated 11/5/02 5:39:35 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nope, I think that's unfair. It ought to be one vote for a certain
amount of fabric used in dress.
Ritu
GSV 5 Yards To A Saree
**buzzer**
Saree, your answer is Sarong.
William Taylor
William wrote:
The UNSC might actually work better with the men drunk and the
females naked.
OK, I just got an image of Jeanne Kirkpatrick naked.
You bastard, I'm coming to kill you for that.
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silence. I am watching television. - Spider Jerusalem
At 22:22 04-11-2002 -0500, John Giorgis wrote:
I know that the US, especially under the current Administration, is
often-criticized for having unilateralist tendencies, and disregarding the
opinions of the international community.
With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United States
In a message dated 11/5/2002 6:29:23 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I just got an image of Jeanne Kirkpatrick naked.
You bastard, I'm coming to kill you for that.
See Richard Baker for the cost of the ammunition.
And it was Alberto Monteiro who first
You want US unilateralism. I'll give you US unilateralism:
In the immortal words of Randy Newman:
Political Science
No one likes us
I don't know why.
We may not be perfect
But heaven knows we try.
But all around even our old friends put us down.
Let's drop the big one and see what happens
- Original Message -
From: Horn, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
You want US unilateralism. I'll give you US unilateralism:
In the immortal words of Randy Newman:
Political Science
While
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:26:38AM -0800, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
All of this negotiation, etc. should have taken place or at least been
wrapping up before the President made it a public issue.
Absolutely not. Lots of secret negotiations behind closed doors that the
citizens don't know about? No
- Original Message -
From: Ritu Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:24 AM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
Dan Minette wrote:
Why I can see being opposed to attacking Iraq, I'm rather
surprised by your
language.
Could you specify
- Original Message -
From: Matt Grimaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: US Unilateralism
John D. Giorgis wrote:
I know that the US, especially under the current Administration, is
often-criticized for having
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
No, it should be
one-vote-for-average-number-of-pieces-of-clothing-worn.
:-)
Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian
girl would have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse
(3), bellybutton piercing (4), necklace (5),
Jim Sharkey wrote:
Hmmm... Let me see how many votes a typical brazilian
girl would have: panties (1), miniskirt (2), microblouse
(3), bellybutton piercing (4), necklace (5), wristlaces (6)
and (7), anklelaces (8) and (9), ... Hmmm... Maybe it's
a fair criterium
Since when is a
- Original Message -
From: Ritu Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:49 AM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
Robert Seeberger wrote:
With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United
States has now
let the United Nations
[[Parent Advisory: explicit content in this message]]
Dan Minette wrote:
BTW, I had never seen as many tourists as I saw today...
I stayed in a hotel on the Copa when I was in Rio.
The Copa = Copacabana.
It looked very run
down; there were hookers every block or so.
They all looked like
- Original Message -
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: US Unilateralism
Erik Reuter wrote:
But if you count the largest democracy by the number of
direct votes given to the President
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ritu Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:49 AM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
Robert Seeberger wrote:
The point I'm trying to make is that your response has the
effect of being
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: US Unilateralism
Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ritu Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
I know that the US, especially under the current Administration, is
often-criticized for having unilateralist tendencies, and disregarding the
opinions of the international community.
With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United States has now
let the United Nations deliberate for
John D. Giorgis wrote:
Does anyone know if the rest of the world is giving the US credit for
sticking with the multilateral approach, and engaging both its allies and
the UNSC members in very long and difficult negotiations, and working
towards an ultimate resolution in the United Nations that
John D. Giorgis wrote:
With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United
States has now
let the United Nations deliberate for nearly two months (and
counting) on
its dispute with Iraq?
g
..the US has *let* the UN deliberate...?
Interesting terminology there, JDG. :)
- Original Message -
From: Ritu Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:51 PM
Subject: RE: US Unilateralism
John D. Giorgis wrote:
With that being said, has anybody noticed that the United
States has now
let the United Nations deliberate
43 matches
Mail list logo
