Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-27 Thread Dave Land
On Mar 26, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 01:50 AM Thursday 3/23/2006, Dave Land wrote: On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: Being pretty much in 1-1 correspondence with machine language, it also offers you the opportunity to get into

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-26 Thread Julia Thompson
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 01:50 AM Thursday 3/23/2006, Dave Land wrote: On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: Being pretty much in 1-1 correspondence with machine language, it also offers you the opportunity to get into places you probably shouldn't be and mess things up

hardware suckz

2006-03-24 Thread Alberto Monteiro
I give up. My backup HD is fully readable and writable from Linux, all auxiliary windoze programs can read it, but evil windoze itself keeps giving me the stupid and meaningless error Data error (cyclic redundancy check). I have lost too much time. Time to FR. But since I will waste precious

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-24 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 07:15 AM Friday 3/24/2006, Alberto Monteiro wrote: I give up. My backup HD is fully readable and writable from Linux, all auxiliary windoze programs can read it, but evil windoze itself keeps giving me the stupid and meaningless error Data error (cyclic redundancy check). I have lost too

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-23 Thread maru dubshinki
On 3/22/06, Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Fool wrote: Fat32 There's your problem _Right There_. Unless you are using some version of win9x that needs to be able to see this partition, you need to be using NTFS. It's better in every way. And you can compress NTFS

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-23 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 01:50 AM Thursday 3/23/2006, Dave Land wrote: On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: Being pretty much in 1-1 correspondence with machine language, it also offers you the opportunity to get into places you probably shouldn't be and mess things up royally, even (in fact,

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-23 Thread Steve Sloan
maru dubshinki wrote: Actually Linux can read NTFS, and fairly well. I once helped a friend set it up so he could listen to his music collection - but the real problem is that you have to go in via the command line (AFAIK), and Windows is *extremely* hostile to CLIs, what with all the

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-23 Thread maru dubshinki
On 3/23/06, Steve Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maru dubshinki wrote: Actually Linux can read NTFS, and fairly well. I once helped a friend set it up so he could listen to his music collection - but the real problem is that you have to go in via the command line (AFAIK), and

hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
My backup HD seems to be corrupted under game mode [Windows XP], giving an error message [in Portuguese] that probably translates to: Data error (cyclic redundancy check) It's a MAXTOR, and it is functional in Linux. I _may_ have hit the computer the last time I switched to game mode, prior to

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Charlie Bell
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:07 PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote: My backup HD seems to be corrupted under game mode [Windows XP], giving an error message [in Portuguese] that probably translates to: Data error (cyclic redundancy check) It's a MAXTOR, and it is functional in Linux. I _may_ have hit

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Charlie Bell wrote: Is there any way to recover the HD for Windows XP without FR? Spinrite might do it, it's a dos thing. Don't have a copy handy unfortunately, my windows stuff is all in Cyprus (and I'm in Oz still with my iBook...). Just as curiosity, I checked the spinrite site.

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Charlie Bell
On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Charlie Bell wrote: Is there any way to recover the HD for Windows XP without FR? Spinrite might do it, it's a dos thing. Don't have a copy handy unfortunately, my windows stuff is all in Cyprus (and I'm in Oz still with my

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread The Fool
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlie Bell wrote: Is there any way to recover the HD for Windows XP without FR? Spinrite might do it, it's a dos thing. Don't have a copy handy unfortunately, my windows stuff is all in Cyprus (and I'm in Oz still with my iBook...).

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
The Fool wrote: Is there any way to recover the HD for Windows XP without FR? Did you try using chkdsk.exe? Yes, but it was useless, like any other Windows XP resident (evil) tool. They either repeat the meaningless error message, or recomend FR. I will[*] try using Linux tools like

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread The Fool
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Fool wrote: Is there any way to recover the HD for Windows XP without FR? Did you try using chkdsk.exe? Yes, but it was useless, like any other Windows XP resident (evil) tool. They either repeat the meaningless error message, or

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
The Fool wrote: Is the HD partition FAT, Fat32, NTFS or other? Fat32 And shouldn't you be ysung Windows 2000 or win98SE for your 'game computer'? XP adds nothing but heartache and errors to a game-machine. I bought the computer with Windows XP. You should always keep your data (games,

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread The Fool
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Fool wrote: Is the HD partition FAT, Fat32, NTFS or other? Fat32 There's your problem _Right There_. Unless you are using some version of win9x that needs to be able to see this partition, you need to be using NTFS. It's better in every

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
The Fool wrote: Fat32 There's your problem _Right There_. Unless you are using some version of win9x that needs to be able to see this partition, you need to be using NTFS. It's better in every way. And you can compress NTFS drives. See if you can't dig up an old version of

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread The Fool
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Fool wrote: Fat32 There's your problem _Right There_. Unless you are using some version of win9x that needs to be able to see this partition, you need to be using NTFS. It's better in every way. And you can compress NTFS drives.

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
The Fool wrote: But NTFS is not visible to Linux. I'm _sure_ there are versions of programs in specific linux distros that do understand NTFS. Ask some of the more serious linux gurus to help you (I'm sure there's a newsgroup that can help you set it up right). Now you force me to do

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread The Fool
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Fool wrote: But NTFS is not visible to Linux. I'm _sure_ there are versions of programs in specific linux distros that do understand NTFS. Ask some of the more serious linux gurus to help you (I'm sure there's a newsgroup that

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
The Fool wrote: Now you force me to do a little Linux bashing :-) Never a bad thing. Yes, because it keeps our criticism, not because Linux is worse than the standard PC-alternative :-P Also, I never found a newsgroup with gurus that could help me. All my problems were analysed,

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread The Fool
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Fool wrote: Now you force me to do a little Linux bashing :-) Never a bad thing. Yes, because it keeps our criticism, not because Linux is worse than the standard PC-alternative :-P But 99% of open source progams outside of the the

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro
The Fool wrote: Yes, because it keeps our criticism, not because Linux is worse than the standard PC-alternative :-P But 99% of open source progams outside of the the top 30 are terrible, horrble, craptackularly bad. Sturgeon Law Squared? 99% of everything is terrible, horrible,

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread The Fool
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Fool wrote: Yes, because it keeps our criticism, not because Linux is worse than the standard PC-alternative :-P But 99% of open source progams outside of the the top 30 are terrible, horrble, craptackularly bad. Sturgeon Law

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 07:00 AM Wednesday 3/22/2006, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Charlie Bell wrote: Is there any way to recover the HD for Windows XP without FR? Spinrite might do it, it's a dos thing. Don't have a copy handy unfortunately, my windows stuff is all in Cyprus (and I'm in Oz still with my

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 22 Mar 2006 at 11:16, The Fool wrote: From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Fool wrote: But NTFS is not visible to Linux. I'm _sure_ there are versions of programs in specific linux distros that do understand NTFS. Ask some of the more serious linux gurus

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 22 Mar 2006 at 10:07, Alberto Monteiro wrote: My backup HD seems to be corrupted under game mode [Windows XP], giving an error message [in Portuguese] that probably translates to: Data error (cyclic redundancy check) It's a MAXTOR, and it is functional in Linux. I _may_ have hit

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread The Fool
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 22 Mar 2006 at 11:16, The Fool wrote: From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Fool wrote: But NTFS is not visible to Linux. I'm _sure_ there are versions of programs in specific linux distros that do understand

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Dave Land
On Mar 22, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote: My backup HD seems to be corrupted under game mode [Windows XP], giving an error message [in Portuguese] that probably translates to: Data error (cyclic redundancy check) It's a MAXTOR, and it is functional in Linux. I _may_ have hit the

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Dave Land
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 07:00 AM Wednesday 3/22/2006, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Charlie Bell wrote: Is there any way to recover the HD for Windows XP without FR? Spinrite might do it, it's a dos thing. Don't have a copy handy unfortunately, my windows stuff

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Julia Thompson
The Fool wrote: You don't do it because it is easy. You do it because it is hard. If you are really looking for some hardcore programmming to do as a hobby try starting here: http://romhacking.net or http://www.rpgone.net or http://agtp.romhack.net/ None of that sissy c++. All hardcore ASM.

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 06:24 PM Wednesday 3/22/2006, Julia Thompson wrote: The Fool wrote: You don't do it because it is easy. You do it because it is hard. If you are really looking for some hardcore programmming to do as a hobby try starting here: http://romhacking.net or http://www.rpgone.net or

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Julia Thompson
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 06:24 PM Wednesday 3/22/2006, Julia Thompson wrote: The Fool wrote: You don't do it because it is easy. You do it because it is hard. If you are really looking for some hardcore programmming to do as a hobby try starting here: http://romhacking.net or

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 10:29 PM Wednesday 3/22/2006, Julia Thompson wrote: Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 06:24 PM Wednesday 3/22/2006, Julia Thompson wrote: The Fool wrote: You don't do it because it is easy. You do it because it is hard. If you are really looking for some hardcore programmming to do as a hobby

Re: hardware suckz

2006-03-22 Thread Dave Land
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: Being pretty much in 1-1 correspondence with machine language, it also offers you the opportunity to get into places you probably shouldn't be and mess things up royally, even (in fact, usually) unintentionally . . . Bottom line: this

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-27 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Keith Henson wrote: But then I will not be able to _buy_ a new one! Why not? You know what kind of processor you have and there are only a few kind of heat sinks. But what is the point of buying a new one if I don't fknow how to remove the old one? Alberto Monteiro

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-27 Thread Erik Reuter
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +, Alberto Monteiro wrote: But what is the point of buying a new one if I don't fknow how to remove the old one? Spending money to help the economy. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ ___

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-27 Thread Doug Pensinger
Alberto wrote: But what is the point of buying a new one if I don't fknow how to remove the old one? Do your kids have any pets? You could always rig up the fan to provide ventilation in a small animal enclosure. Or you could build a micro wind tunnel to test airborne nano-tech. -- Doug

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-27 Thread Nick Arnett
Alberto Monteiro wrote: Keith Henson wrote: But then I will not be able to _buy_ a new one! Why not? You know what kind of processor you have and there are only a few kind of heat sinks. But what is the point of buying a new one if I don't fknow how to remove the old one? The instructions for

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-27 Thread Bryon Daly
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 00:55:59 +, Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Keith Henson wrote: My CPU cooler is behaving strangely: it sometimes spins, other times doesn't. Which means that I have to chance the damned thing. Problem: is there any way to _remove_ it without breaking

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-27 Thread Ronn Blankenship
At 15:07 27-12-04 +, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Keith Henson wrote: But then I will not be able to _buy_ a new one! Why not? You know what kind of processor you have and there are only a few kind of heat sinks. But what is the point of buying a new one if I don't fknow how to remove the

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-27 Thread Keith Henson
At 03:07 PM 27/12/04 +, you wrote: Keith Henson wrote: But then I will not be able to _buy_ a new one! Why not? You know what kind of processor you have and there are only a few kind of heat sinks. But what is the point of buying a new one if I don't fknow how to remove the old one?

Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-26 Thread Alberto Monteiro
My CPU cooler is behaving strangely: it sometimes spins, other times doesn't. Which means that I have to chance the damned thing. Problem: is there any way to _remove_ it without breaking everything? Alberto Monteiro ___

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-26 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 02:18:57PM +, Alberto Monteiro wrote: My CPU cooler is behaving strangely: it sometimes spins, other times doesn't. Which means that I have to chance the damned thing. Problem: is there any way to _remove_ it without breaking everything? Yes. -- Erik Reuter

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-26 Thread Keith Henson
At 02:18 PM 26/12/04 +, you wrote: My CPU cooler is behaving strangely: it sometimes spins, other times doesn't. Which means that I have to chance the damned thing. Problem: is there any way to _remove_ it without breaking everything? Typically you can release the spring that holds it on with

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-26 Thread Keith Henson
At 09:51 AM 26/12/04 -0500, you wrote: snip If you oil the fans every year or two, they will outlast the computer going obsolete. Pictures here. http://www.dansdata.com/fanmaint.htm ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-26 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Keith Henson wrote: My CPU cooler is behaving strangely: it sometimes spins, other times doesn't. Which means that I have to chance the damned thing. Problem: is there any way to _remove_ it without breaking everything? Typically you can release the spring that holds it on with a

Re: Irregulars question: hardware suckz :-/

2004-12-26 Thread Keith Henson
At 12:55 AM 27/12/04 +, you wrote: Keith Henson wrote: My CPU cooler is behaving strangely: it sometimes spins, other times doesn't. Which means that I have to chance the damned thing. Problem: is there any way to _remove_ it without breaking everything? Typically you can release the