Jorpho said:
None of these messages really had any good reason to appear on this
list. It is also not immediately obvious who is responsible for any of
these messages - not Mr. van Baardwijk, nor this Arnett person I have
never heard of otherwise - unless the From address provides any real
I don't think that would be the most benificial.
I think that this whole buisness needs to be played out for it ever to end.
After all how would you feel in the same position? I know how I would feel.
The question is, does Mr. van Baardwijk actualy want it to end? Can he humble
himself to
At Stardate 20030611.0116, Doyle Brunson wrote:
Seems to me Jeroen is responsible. He is the listowner, and he has been
repeatedly sending multiple spam emails to around 100 people.
Significantly less than 100, actually...
These people have kindly asked him to stop the spamming, and he has
--- David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let it go, and leave the old list alone.
Or don't let it go, but call it for what it is. Their is no reason to sculk
away, but resolution requires personal honesty, humility, and dignity.
Come one Jeroen, do the honerable thing and step up. You wouldn't
Seems to me Jeroen is responsible. He is the listowner, and he has been repeatedly
sending multiple spam emails to around 100 people. These people have kindly asked him
to stop the spamming, and he has refused. It is ironic that you talk about this being
a fresh start when it seems Jeroen has
