Re: Google Wave

2009-10-19 Thread Deborah Harrell
 From: Matt Grimaldi matzeb...@yahoo.com

 FUD usually appears as an acronym for
 the usual resistance to change:
 
   Fear
   Uncertainty
   Doubt

Oh, dear.  I'm hosed.  I neither twitter nor text nor have a phone that I use 
for anything other than talking...

Debbi
I Am NOT A Fuddy-Duddy!!! Maru   

...am I?


  

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-19 Thread Matt Grimaldi
 From: Matt Grimaldi matzeb...@yahoo.com


 FUD usually appears as an acronym for
 the usual resistance to change:
 
   Fear
   Uncertainty
   Doubt



From: Deborah Harrell harrellmed...@yahoo.com

]Oh, dear.  I'm hosed.  I neither twitter nor text nor have a phone that I use 
for anything other than talking...
]
]Debbi
]I Am NOT A Fuddy-Duddy!!! Maru  
]
]...am I?


No, you just haven't found the killer app that would make you *need* to get one 
yet.  Being a late adopter doesn't become FUD until you're trying to convince 
everyone that it (whatever it is...) is just a fad, will be dangerous, won't 
work properly, will cost too much, and so on...

-- Matt

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-16 Thread Jo Anne
Thanks, Max and Bruce.  But I have one more question.  What's FUD?  Is it
printable?

Amities,

Jo Anne
evens...@hevanet.com




___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-16 Thread Matt Grimaldi
FUD usually appears as an acronym for the usual resistance to change:

  Fear
  Uncertainty
  Doubt

-- Matt





- Original Message 
From: Jo Anne evens...@hevanet.com
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Fri, October 16, 2009 12:45:22 PM
Subject: Re: Google Wave 

Thanks, Max and Bruce.  But I have one more question.  What's FUD?  Is it
printable?

Amities,

Jo Anne
evens...@hevanet.com




___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-15 Thread sendai

On 15/10/2009, at 8:11 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au  
wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if  
there was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my  
try it out by joining a discussion about the future?
Wayne, I used this e-mail address for my wave account  
(sen...@iicx.net) so perhaps try adding that address to the wave?


Can you invite others to the beta? I'm interested, but I don't have  
access.
It's a bit of a bugger, but no, not easily. I maintain many Google  
hosted mail/apps/etc. services for clients and didn't get anything  
other than a secondary invite (which at present can not invite others.)




Nick
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-15 Thread sendai

On 15/10/2009, at 8:18 AM, Wayne Eddy wrote:

No Problem, Nick.
I will send you an invite - I think it might take a few days to  
process though.

I assume you want to use this address nick.arn...@gmail.com ?
The invites aren't linked to the e-mail address it's sent to; once the  
user has received the invite, they can use it with any e-mail address  
they wish. And yes, they do take a few days to process.



 Regards,

Wayne.

- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave



On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au  
wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if  
there was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my  
try it out by joining a discussion about the future?


Can you invite others to the beta? I'm interested, but I don't have  
access.


Nick
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-15 Thread Jo Anne
OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave?  Is it like what Twits do with
Tweets?  I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave?  Speak slowly and
directly into the microphone, please.

Amities,

Jo Anne
evens...@hevanet.com




___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-15 Thread Max Battcher

Jo Anne wrote:

OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave?  Is it like what Twits do with
Tweets?  I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave?  Speak slowly and
directly into the microphone, please.


It depends on who you ask and how much hype they've ingested, digested, 
and are prepared to spew back at you...


Basically, Google Wave is an attempt at a convergence of... well, 
everything that is communication, actually. It tries to converge the 
immediacy of IM or Twitter with the long term storage and general 
richness of email or forum conversations or Word documents.


It has the possibility of becoming One Inbox to Rule Them All, but 
that invokes a lot of assumptions that may not necessarily be true nor 
become true.


So far, I remain a skeptic of the project: considering how hard it is to 
explain the system I wonder if it is too complex to easily gain 
mainstream acceptance/usage.


You can watch the long video (and it is long) trying to explain the 
thing at the Wave website:


http://wave.google.com

--
--Max Battcher--
http://worldmaker.net

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-15 Thread Bruce Bostwick

On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Max Battcher wrote:


Jo Anne wrote:
OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave?  Is it like what Twits do  
with
Tweets?  I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave?  Speak  
slowly and

directly into the microphone, please.


It depends on who you ask and how much hype they've ingested,  
digested, and are prepared to spew back at you...


Basically, Google Wave is an attempt at a convergence of... well,  
everything that is communication, actually. It tries to converge the  
immediacy of IM or Twitter with the long term storage and general  
richness of email or forum conversations or Word documents.


It has the possibility of becoming One Inbox to Rule Them All, but  
that invokes a lot of assumptions that may not necessarily be true  
nor become true.


So far, I remain a skeptic of the project: considering how hard it  
is to explain the system I wonder if it is too complex to easily  
gain mainstream acceptance/usage.


You can watch the long video (and it is long) trying to explain the  
thing at the Wave website:


http://wave.google.com


I haven't chimed in on Wave or the more general subject of cloud  
computing yet, since I haven't used it yet (which, in some people's  
judgment, makes me ineligible to comment, although I consider that a  
questionable argument), but my misgivings about it are generally  
related to the same question of how valid the underlying assumptions  
are, as well as the overall reliability of the servers the storage  
lives on.


(It seems to me that a lot of the hype around the cloud computing  
concept is really thin on details of infrastructure, storage  
reliability/redundancy and backup maintenance, privacy protection, and  
a whole range of other unanswered questions I've had about it.  And  
for people who seem so eager to have me store my personal data on  
their servers, a lot of those unanswered questions are show stoppers  
for me.)


The true paradox of democracy is that it is vulnerable to defeat from  
within -- Me



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-15 Thread Max Battcher

Bruce Bostwick wrote:
I haven't chimed in on Wave or the more general subject of cloud 
computing yet, since I haven't used it yet (which, in some people's 
judgment, makes me ineligible to comment, although I consider that a 
questionable argument), but my misgivings about it are generally related 
to the same question of how valid the underlying assumptions are, as 
well as the overall reliability of the servers the storage lives on.


In terms of specific to Google Wave: for now early adopters should trust 
Google's storage policies (and considering the vast number of people 
with Gmail addresses, many do), with the addition of the Google 
way-early-beta caveat.


In the mid to long term other servers should start to pick up Wave 
usage. The entire Java source to run your own Wave server is available 
for use and adaptation and servers talk to each other in similar ways to 
email servers (so Wave participant addresses right now are things like 
max.battc...@googlewave.com, which look like email addresses but aren't 
guaranteed to be one and the same). (More accurately, the server to 
server protocols are based on the more recent XMPP IM standards rather 
than decades-old email, but the general idea is the same...)


(It seems to me that a lot of the hype around the cloud computing 
concept is really thin on details of infrastructure, storage 
reliability/redundancy and backup maintenance, privacy protection, and a 
whole range of other unanswered questions I've had about it.  And for 
people who seem so eager to have me store my personal data on their 
servers, a lot of those unanswered questions are show stoppers for me.)


Well cloud computing has come to embody a lot of concepts, generally, 
and can be anything from marketing droid speak to a beloved panacea from 
the computing gods... To be honest the term in common parlance doesn't 
seem to have a very well-defined meaning anymore.


Generally, individual cloud computing providers should be able to 
provide you with all of the details that you need, and your questions 
are unanswered, you may not be asking the right people...


All of the services that I use on a daily basis are very forthright with 
that sort of information and I would say that I have days where I am 
very paranoid.


It's hard to argue anything at a general cloud computing level, and 
just like any other set of services you have to go into each 
relationship with some idea of your intent and the company/entity's 
trustworthiness. Perhaps if you named specific services or concerns your 
questions might be answered.


--
--Max Battcher--
http://worldmaker.net

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-15 Thread Bruce Bostwick

On Oct 15, 2009, at 4:35 PM, Max Battcher wrote:

Bruce Bostwick wrote:
I haven't chimed in on Wave or the more general subject of cloud  
computing yet, since I haven't used it yet (which, in some people's  
judgment, makes me ineligible to comment, although I consider that  
a questionable argument), but my misgivings about it are generally  
related to the same question of how valid the underlying  
assumptions are, as well as the overall reliability of the servers  
the storage lives on.


In terms of specific to Google Wave: for now early adopters should  
trust Google's storage policies (and considering the vast number of  
people with Gmail addresses, many do), with the addition of the  
Google way-early-beta caveat.


In the mid to long term other servers should start to pick up Wave  
usage. The entire Java source to run your own Wave server is  
available for use and adaptation and servers talk to each other in  
similar ways to email servers (so Wave participant addresses right  
now are things like max.battc...@googlewave.com, which look like  
email addresses but aren't guaranteed to be one and the same). (More  
accurately, the server to server protocols are based on the more  
recent XMPP IM standards rather than decades-old email, but the  
general idea is the same...)


(It seems to me that a lot of the hype around the cloud computing  
concept is really thin on details of infrastructure, storage  
reliability/redundancy and backup maintenance, privacy protection,  
and a whole range of other unanswered questions I've had about it.   
And for people who seem so eager to have me store my personal data  
on their servers, a lot of those unanswered questions are show  
stoppers for me.)


Well cloud computing has come to embody a lot of concepts,  
generally, and can be anything from marketing droid speak to a  
beloved panacea from the computing gods... To be honest the term in  
common parlance doesn't seem to have a very well-defined meaning  
anymore.


Generally, individual cloud computing providers should be able to  
provide you with all of the details that you need, and your  
questions are unanswered, you may not be asking the right people...


All of the services that I use on a daily basis are very forthright  
with that sort of information and I would say that I have days where  
I am very paranoid.


It's hard to argue anything at a general cloud computing level,  
and just like any other set of services you have to go into each  
relationship with some idea of your intent and the company/entity's  
trustworthiness. Perhaps if you named specific services or concerns  
your questions might be answered.


Part of my concern with the concept in general is the fairly glaring  
admin/management deficiency described in this article:


http://dailyqi.com/?p=10576

Even though Danger is owned by Microsoft, who is a proponent of  
cloud-based computing where data is stored and possibly reproduced  
across a number of services, only one server apparently was used.  
This isn’t the problem here, but it’s the apparent lack of any data  
backup by Danger is. The company’s statement on this should be very  
interesting.


Granted, the mistake was fairly obvious, but it's hard to find out  
about things like that up front.  (Although, as you say, any provider  
that's reluctant or outright unable to answer questions like what  
backup strategy do you use? isn't a good choice ..)


I'm probably not a typical Texan in that I don't hunt. I fish, but I  
don't hunt. And it has nothing to do with how I think it might somehow  
be more holy to eat meat that's been bludgeoned to death by someone  
else, that's not it. It's really early in the morning, it's really  
cold outside, and...I don't wanna  go. -- Ron White




___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-14 Thread Nick Arnett
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au wrote:

 Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
 anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by
 joining a discussion about the future?


Can you invite others to the beta? I'm interested, but I don't have access.

Nick
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-14 Thread Wayne Eddy
No Problem, Nick.
I will send you an invite - I think it might take a few days to process though.
I assume you want to use this address nick.arn...@gmail.com ?

Regards,

Wayne.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Nick Arnett 
  To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion 
  Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
  Subject: Re: Google Wave





  On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au wrote:

Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was 
anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by joining 
a discussion about the future?

  Can you invite others to the beta? I'm interested, but I don't have access.

  Nick 





--


  ___
  http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-14 Thread Lance A. Brown


Wayne Eddy said the following on 10/14/2009 6:07 PM:
 Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there
 was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out
 by joining a discussion about the future?
 
 Regards,
 
 Wayne Eddy

I'd love to get an invite and give it a try as well, Wayne.

-- 
 GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9
 CACert.org Assurer

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-14 Thread Nick Arnett
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au wrote:

  No Problem, Nick.
 I will send you an invite - I think it might take a few days to process
 though.
 I assume you want to use this address nick.arn...@gmail.com ?


That's the one.

Thanks!

Nick
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-14 Thread Dave Land

Wayne,

Top-posting to say, Me, too, please!

Dave

On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Wayne Eddy wrote:


No Problem, Nick.
I will send you an invite - I think it might take a few days to  
process though.

I assume you want to use this address nick.arn...@gmail.com ?

Regards,

Wayne.

- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave



On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au  
wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if  
there was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my  
try it out by joining a discussion about the future?


Can you invite others to the beta? I'm interested, but I don't have  
access.


Nick



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com




___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-14 Thread Wayne Eddy
Hi Lance, have you got a gmail address you want to use?
I have sent Nick  Dave invites, and I am happy to you one too, but I want to 
invite a few others from elsewhere so three invites for the Brin List will have 
to do for now.  

Looking forward to waving with you in the near future,

Regards, Wayne.

P.S.

Google says:
Google Wave is more fun when you have others to wave with, so please nominate 
people you would like to add. Keep in mind that this is a preview so it could 
be a bit rocky at times.


Invitations will not be sent immediately. We have a lot of stamps to lick.
Happy waving!

 

- Original Message - 
From: Lance A. Brown la...@bearcircle.net
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave


 
 
 Wayne Eddy said the following on 10/14/2009 6:07 PM:
 Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there
 was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out
 by joining a discussion about the future?
 
 Regards,
 
 Wayne Eddy
 
 I'd love to get an invite and give it a try as well, Wayne.
 
 -- 
 GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9
 CACert.org Assurer
 
 ___
 http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-14 Thread Lance A. Brown


Wayne Eddy said the following on 10/14/2009 11:28 PM:
 Hi Lance, have you got a gmail address you want to use?
 I have sent Nick  Dave invites, and I am happy to you one too, but I
 want to invite a few others from elsewhere so three invites for the Brin
 List will have to do for now.  
  
 Looking forward to waving with you in the near future,

Hi,

You can use lance.a.br...@gmail.com for my invite.

Thanks,
  --[Lance]

-- 
 GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9
 CACert.org Assurer

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Google Wave

2009-10-14 Thread Doug Pensinger
Looks cool, count me in please.  Use brig...@zo.com

Thanks,

Doug

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
 Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
 anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by
 joining a discussion about the future?

 Regards,

 Wayne Eddy

 ___
 http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com