Charlie wrote:
It did. It rained. We had a couple of mils. It helped with the containment
of the fires.
We've spent much of the day wondering whether the fire at Daylesford will
skip containment lines, and burn down Claire's folks' cottage. But, you
know. Money. Jobs. So on. Real stuff like
On 26/02/2009, at 5:00 PM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
Glad to hear you've had a little rain Charlie, hope its enough to
keep your family's cottage (and many others) safe.
Actually, no. *sigh* Another 40 degree day tomorrow, and strong winds.
Many schools have been closed.
Charlie.
For a first order approximation you would throw away topography as
irrelevant (after all, it starts at only 30% and gets smaller as you add
water) and you would treat the Earth as a proper sphere using distance from
the center of the sphere to mean sea level as diameter.
Assume a constant
From: Trent Shipley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a first order approximation you would throw away topography as
irrelevant (after all, it starts at only 30% and gets smaller as you
add
water) and you would treat the Earth as a proper sphere using distance
from
the center of the sphere to mean
At 05:01 AM 12/5/02 -0600, The Fool wrote:
Suppose you wanted to calculate the time it would take an even consistent
rainfall over the entire surface of the earth to raise the sea level
above the level of Mt. Everest (+5 miles or so), what would you need to
know about rainfall, volume of the
On Thursday 05 December 2002 04:01 am, The Fool wrote:
Suppose you wanted to calculate the time it would take an even
consistent
rainfall over the entire surface of the earth to raise the sea level
above the level of Mt. Everest (+5 miles or so), what would you need to
know about rainfall,
