On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Erik Greenwald wrote:
>
> Could you make the data/results public? (could even be a nifty blog post or
> article)
Sure. Feel free to download and use them, but you may have to improve
them as they still don't get too relevant.
> There were also very slight differ
On Oct 15, 2014, at 8:01 PM, Erik Greenwald wrote:
> Could you make the data/results public? (could even be a nifty blog post or
> article)
whoops, didn't see the links in the post-script. Very interesting graph, the
non-tie line particularly. This was just one rt sample at each tri count?
>
On Oct 15, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Ștefan-Gabriel Mirea
wrote:
>> The downside is that it’s more work and we may have to follow our
>> deprecation policy to change user-visible options if they were documented
>> somewhere.
>
> Nevertheless, it looks like a better solution, so I will read the
> CHA
On Oct 15, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Ștefan-Gabriel Mirea
wrote:
> I made a little research to find the best value for
> MIN_TRIANGLES_FOR_TIE[1]. I made a C++ program that generates a BoT
> with a specified number of triangles, whose vertices are organized
> like the nodes of the latitude-longitude
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
>
> After validation and comparisons were completed (several years ago) the
> options remained because there is a limitation. Sometimes TIE prep is *much*
> slower than our traditional method. So slow that "old_prep+old_shot <
On Oct 14, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Ștefan-Gabriel Mirea
wrote:
>> #2 Eliminate rt_bot_mintie global altogether. Make rt_bot_prep() read the
>> environment variable on-demand (which is called during rt_dirbuild()). Any
>> user tools that expose a bot_mintie option (e.g., nirt, rt, and archer) will
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
>
>> What would be the best approach?
>
> I’d suggest either #1 or #2:
>
> #1 Move rt_bot_mintie into the rtip structure. With that working and the
> global eliminated, you then just have to ensure the value is set when an rtip
>
On Oct 12, 2014, at 11:56 AM, Ștefan-Gabriel Mirea
wrote:
> I was looking to the next issue in the BUGS file: ged_gqa() directly
> calls rt_new_rti() instead of using rt_dirbuild() to create a rt_i
> structure, which causes the LIBRT_BOT_MINTIE environment variable to
> be ignored.
Nice one...
Hello!
I was looking to the next issue in the BUGS file: ged_gqa() directly
calls rt_new_rti() instead of using rt_dirbuild() to create a rt_i
structure, which causes the LIBRT_BOT_MINTIE environment variable to
be ignored.
I thought of some possible solutions to fix this, but none of them
looks
