[quoted lines by Chris Brannon on 2017/07/08 at 15:49 -0700]
>Any reason this patch shouldn't go in?
That was good timing as I was just including it now. You'll notice, though,
that I modified it because I didn't like the duplication of the keyfile:
specification.
--
Dave Mielke | 2
Any reason this patch shouldn't go in?
-- Chris
___
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@brltty.com
For general information, go to: http://brltty.com/mailman/listinfo/brltty
Christopher Brannon, on mer. 05 juil. 2017 10:12:42 -0700, wrote:
> When polkit support was not built, the auth server was
> refusing to start with the old value of BRLAPI_DEFAUTH.
That looks good to me :)
> ---
> Programs/brlapi.h.in | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a
When polkit support was not built, the auth server was
refusing to start with the old value of BRLAPI_DEFAUTH.
---
Programs/brlapi.h.in | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Programs/brlapi.h.in b/Programs/brlapi.h.in
index b49e8c6eb..ed2c8cfbe 100644
--- a/Programs/brlapi.h.in
+
