Re: [Bro-Dev] package manager progress

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 6:37 PM, Siwek, Jon wrote: > > >> On Aug 5, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Slagell, Adam J wrote: >> >> If we are going to rely on metadata, which I agree can be better as you can >> tag a package with multiple categories, we should

Re: [Bro-Dev] package manager progress

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Slagell, Adam J wrote: > > If we are going to rely on metadata, which I agree can be better as you can > tag a package with multiple categories, we should probably have some basic > requirements for this type of metadata. At a minimum,

Re: [Bro-Dev] package manager progress

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 12:52 PM, Robin Sommer wrote: > >> >> Hhhm, is it naming conventions that people have a problem with or the >> implication of policing? > > The problem is that the suggested naming convention wouldn't work: > it's not clear how somebody would name their

Re: [Bro-Dev] package manager progress

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:47 +, you wrote: > Hhhm, is it naming conventions that people have a problem with or the > implication of policing? The problem is that the suggested naming convention wouldn't work: it's not clear how somebody would name their plugin if it provided more than