Re: [Bro-Dev] Feedback on configuration framework implementation

2017-12-01 Thread Johanna Amann
> > think of that. I honestly also never liked modifying the values that are > > passed in arguments; this is for example also theoretically possible for > > events, but something that we have avoided to use in practice so far. > > Yeah, and it also won't work for atomic values, at least not

Re: [Bro-Dev] Feedback on configuration framework implementation

2017-12-01 Thread Robin Sommer
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 15:22 +, you wrote: > Now I'm glad I never got it to work right :-) Me too. :-) Robin -- Robin Sommer * ICSI/LBNL * ro...@icir.org * www.icir.org/robin ___ bro-dev mailing list bro-dev@bro.org

Re: [Bro-Dev] Feedback on configuration framework implementation

2017-12-01 Thread Azoff, Justin S
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 9:58 AM, Robin Sommer wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:28 -0800, you wrote: > >> think of that. I honestly also never liked modifying the values that are >> passed in arguments; this is for example also theoretically possible for >> events, but

Re: [Bro-Dev] Feedback on configuration framework implementation

2017-12-01 Thread Robin Sommer
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:28 -0800, you wrote: > think of that. I honestly also never liked modifying the values that are > passed in arguments; this is for example also theoretically possible for > events, but something that we have avoided to use in practice so far. Yeah, and it also