Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On 12/12/10 5:35 PM, Greg Lewis wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 09:01:00AM -0800, Greg Lewis wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:02:17PM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote: On 12/9/10 8:24 PM, Kurt Miller wrote: On 12/02/10 17:07, Dalibor Topic wrote: On 12/2/10 10:51 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: Question.

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 09:01:00AM -0800, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:02:17PM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > On 12/9/10 8:24 PM, Kurt Miller wrote: > > > On 12/02/10 17:07, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > >> On 12/2/10 10:51 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: > > >>> Question. > > >>> > > >>> Mac

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:02:17PM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 12/9/10 8:24 PM, Kurt Miller wrote: > > On 12/02/10 17:07, Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> On 12/2/10 10:51 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: > >>> Question. > >>> > >>> Mac OS X porting project will be hosted in actual bsd-port or will > >>> have

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On 12/9/10 8:24 PM, Kurt Miller wrote: > On 12/02/10 17:07, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> On 12/2/10 10:51 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: >>> Question. >>> >>> Mac OS X porting project will be hosted in actual bsd-port or will >>> have its own port ? >> >> The latter - see >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/piperm

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On 12/02/10 17:07, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 12/2/10 10:51 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: >> Question. >> >> Mac OS X porting project will be hosted in actual bsd-port or will >> have its own port ? > > The latter - see > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2010-December/001627.html for > rati

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

>> Mac OS X porting project will be hosted in actual bsd-port or will >> have its own port ? > > The latter - see > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2010-December/001627.html for > rationale. Hum, so I'll have to track two differents locations and twice more builds, but it's not a p

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On 12/2/10 10:51 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: > Question. > > Mac OS X porting project will be hosted in actual bsd-port or will > have its own port ? The latter - see http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2010-December/001627.html for rationale. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

> On 12/1/10 1:02 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> I've gone ahead and proposed a Mac OS X porting project with my Porters >> Group Member hat, >> with a CFV in the Porters Group, in order to allow work on the Mac OS port >> to proceed as >> quickly as possible. > > The Porters Group has completed its

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On 12/1/10 1:02 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > I've gone ahead and proposed a Mac OS X porting project with my Porters Group > Member hat, > with a CFV in the Porters Group, in order to allow work on the Mac OS port to > proceed as > quickly as possible. The Porters Group has completed its vote[1]

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On 12/1/10 2:24 AM, Mike Swingler wrote: > Wonderful! Thank you very much Dalibor! > Thanks, Mike - glad to help! cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Nov 30, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 11/17/10 9:33 AM, Mike Swingler wrote: > >>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: >>> >Our work on the private Mac OS X JDK7 port so far has always been a > sub-tree of the public BSD port. Our intention is to bring

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On 11/17/10 9:33 AM, Mike Swingler wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: > > >> >> Our work on the private Mac OS X JDK7 port so far has always been a >> >> sub-tree of the public BSD port. Our intention is to bring the entirety >> >> of the BSD changes along with the M

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Nov 18, 2010, at 2:10 AM, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:22:06PM -0800, Mike Swingler wrote: >> >> As for the targeted version of Mac OS X-specific changes, you can expect >> that we will use Mac OS X 10.6 as a baseline. The Mac OS X 10.6 SDK >> allows us to use blocks (which

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:22:06PM -0800, Mike Swingler wrote: > On Nov 16, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Greg Lewis wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 01:35:31PM -0500, Denis Lussier wrote: > > > >> Seems like great news. I'm interested to hear from folks like Landon > >> & Greg how they think this alters

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:56 AM, John Rose wrote: > On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:35 AM, Mike Swingler wrote: > >> How are blocks mapped to interfaces? > > That is a pure guess on my part. Are they mapped to classes? -- John Perhaps we have a little terminology mixup: by "blocks" I mean C and Objectiv

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:35 AM, Mike Swingler wrote: > How are blocks mapped to interfaces? That is a pure guess on my part. Are they mapped to classes? -- John

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:48 PM, John Rose wrote: > On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Mike Swingler wrote: > >> The Mac OS X 10.6 SDK allows us to use blocks (which _greatly_ simplifies >> interacting with AppKit on the main thread), and has many key pieces of >> functionality exposed as full Cocoa AP

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: > Our work on the private Mac OS X JDK7 port so far has always been a sub-tree > of the public BSD port. Our intention is to bring the entirety of the BSD > changes along with the Mac OS X port. The build doesn't get very far without > the BSD ch

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

> > > > Our work on the private Mac OS X JDK7 port so far has always been a > sub-tree of the public BSD port. Our intention is to bring the entirety of > the BSD changes along with the Mac OS X port. The build doesn't get very far > without the BSD changesets. :-) > > As for the targeted version o

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Mike Swingler wrote: > The Mac OS X 10.6 SDK allows us to use blocks (which _greatly_ simplifies > interacting with AppKit on the main thread), and has many key pieces of > functionality exposed as full Cocoa API (as opposed to using private SPI or > Carbon functio

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Nov 16, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 01:35:31PM -0500, Denis Lussier wrote: > >> Seems like great news. I'm interested to hear from folks like Landon >> & Greg how they think this alters the path forward for OpenJDK 6 & 7 >> on present and older versions of O

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 01:35:31PM -0500, Denis Lussier wrote: > Seems like great news. I'm interested to hear from folks like Landon > & Greg how they think this alters the path forward for OpenJDK 6 & 7 > on present and older versions of OSX. I don't know the answer to that yet. The first I he

Re: Apple Oracle OpenJDK Announcement

Seems like great news. I'm interested to hear from folks like Landon & Greg how they think this alters the path forward for OpenJDK 6 & 7 on present and older versions of OSX. --Denis Lussier Founder & Chief Architect http://openscg.org On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Eric Richardson wrote