On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Eric Richardson wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I made it a bit further by adding SOURCE_LANGUAGE_VERSION=1.5
> TARGET_CLASS_VERSION=1.5 to the make command.
>
> /Users/eric/openjdk/icedtea/bootstrap/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -XX:-PrintVMOptions
> -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX
2009/11/17 Eric Richardson :
> All,
>
> Just wanted to post the patches and the portions that I hand merged. I
> didn't pay much attention to what I needed but I didn't select shark (yet)
> or cacao (unless it is default) and also the solaris patch doesn't seem
> appropriate. Some of these portions
Michael,
I made it a bit further by adding SOURCE_LANGUAGE_VERSION=1.5
TARGET_CLASS_VERSION=1.5 to the make command.
/Users/eric/openjdk/icedtea/bootstrap/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -XX:-PrintVMOptions
-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:-LogVMOutput -Xmx896m -Xms128m
-XX:PermSize=32m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m
All,
Just wanted to post the patches and the portions that I hand merged. I
didn't pay much attention to what I needed but I didn't select shark (yet)
or cacao (unless it is default) and also the solaris patch doesn't seem
appropriate. Some of these portions of the patches may have succeeded but I
Hi Andrew,
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/11/17 Kurt Miller :
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> I'm currently trying to build the BSD tree on linux-amd64 and am confused
>>> by:
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port/jdk/diff/4fef42eb432c/make/common/internal/BinaryPlugs.gmk
>>>
>>
2009/11/17 Kurt Miller :
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> I'm currently trying to build the BSD tree on linux-amd64 and am confused by:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port/jdk/diff/4fef42eb432c/make/common/internal/BinaryPlugs.gmk
>>
>> Why were these additions made? Th
Hi Andrew,
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> I'm currently trying to build the BSD tree on linux-amd64 and am confused by:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port/jdk/diff/4fef42eb432c/make/common/internal/BinaryPlugs.gmk
>
> Why were these additions made? They aren't in either tl or the ice
2009/11/16 Eric Richardson :
> Andrew,
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Andrew John Hughes
> wrote:
>>
>> 2009/11/15 Michael Franz :
>> > Eric,
>> >
>> > I have encountered this issue before. I am not sure what I did to fix
>> > it.
>> > I think I used ecj instead of the Apple javac. Check t
Andrew,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Andrew John Hughes <
gnu_and...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> 2009/11/15 Michael Franz :
> > Eric,
> >
> > I have encountered this issue before. I am not sure what I did to fix
> it.
> > I think I used ecj instead of the Apple javac. Check the javac perl
> sc
Michael,
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Michael Franz wrote:
> Eric,
>
> I have encountered this issue before. I am not sure what I did to fix it.
> I think I used ecj instead of the Apple javac. Check the javac perl script
> that IcedTea has. The other option is to apply this patch in the
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Andrew John Hughes <
gnu_and...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> 2009/11/15 Michael Franz :
> > Eric,
> >
> > I have encountered this issue before. I am not sure what I did to fix
> it.
> > I think I used ecj instead of the Apple javac. Check the javac perl
> script
> >
2009/11/15 Michael Franz :
> Eric,
>
> I have encountered this issue before. I am not sure what I did to fix it.
> I think I used ecj instead of the Apple javac. Check the javac perl script
> that IcedTea has. The other option is to apply this patch in the required
> build files.
>
> http://cr.o
Eric,
I have encountered this issue before. I am not sure what I did to fix it.
I think I used ecj instead of the Apple javac. Check the javac perl script
that IcedTea has. The other option is to apply this patch in the required
build files.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/ecj/01/webrev.01/
13 matches
Mail list logo
