Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-28 Thread Lussier, Denis
I think the path to PPC support is to first get a 32 Bit x86 build done on 10.5 and then make it a Universal Binary that'll work on 10.4 PPC (maybe also 10.3 but I'm not sure bout that). On 11/28/10, MiB wrote: > > 26 nov 2010 kl. 21.51 Denis Lussier wrote: > >> OpenSCG already does this for the

general questions about openjdk

2010-11-28 Thread MiB
26 nov 2010 kl. 21.51 Denis Lussier wrote: > OpenSCG already does this for the Mac with Build 16 32bit, check out > our downlaods page. > Now that Landon has gotten Build 20 working on the Mac, I will shortly > create 32bit (for 10.4+) and 64 bit (for 10.5+) Intel Mac (dmg) > Installers. Please

Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-26 Thread Denis Lussier
OpenSCG already does this for the Mac with Build 16 32bit, check out our downlaods page. Now that Landon has gotten Build 20 working on the Mac, I will shortly create 32bit (for 10.4+) and 64 bit (for 10.5+) Intel Mac (dmg) Installers. --Denis Lussier Founder and Chief Architect http://openscg

Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-25 Thread Henri Gomez
> > > It will be a good thing to have openjdk available as a macport. > > There are downsides to relying on MacPorts, though. Installing a > port-installed app tends to install a whole load of other crap and, quite > often, only a subset is really required. But dependency-creep is hard to > avoid,

Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-24 Thread Ray Kiddy
On Nov 24, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Landon Fuller wrote: > > On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Lussier, Denis wrote: > >> What Build # is the FreeBSD Port of OpenJDK6 now current thru?? How much >> extra work is there to do to get that built and running on the Mac with the >> same limitations as in La

Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-24 Thread Lussier, Denis
Great, thanks. OpenSCG's one-click 32 bit OpenJDK 6 OSX Installer has been stuck at b16 for more than a year now. (I tried fiddling with MacPorts myself a while back on b18 but I got stuck). My objective will be to build 32 bit and 64 bit binaries from 10.5 (where the 32 bit binaries will run on

Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-24 Thread Landon Fuller
On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Lussier, Denis wrote: > What Build # is the FreeBSD Port of OpenJDK6 now current thru?? How much > extra work is there to do to get that built and running on the Mac with the > same limitations as in Landon's b16 OSX Version from April of last year? An updated ma

Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-24 Thread Dmitry Samersoff
On 2010-11-24 23:15, Lussier, Denis wrote: > What Build # is the FreeBSD Port of OpenJDK6 now current thru?? mircat:dms#/usr/local/openjdk6/bin/java -version openjdk version "1.6.0" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b17) OpenJDK Client VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) and (responding to the

Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-24 Thread Lussier, Denis
What Build # is the FreeBSD Port of OpenJDK6 now current thru?? How much extra work is there to do to get that built and running on the Mac with the same limitations as in Landon's b16 OSX Version from April of last year? On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 201

Re: general questions about openjdk

2010-11-24 Thread Greg Lewis
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:12:35PM +0100, develop wrote: > Hello guys, > > I am just "yet another FreeBSD freak" :) > > Since years I am programing in Java and my server environment is > FreeBSD. Currently I am using diablo project but it seems it is no > longer active. I've heard that IBM has

general questions about openjdk

2010-11-23 Thread develop
Hello guys, I am just "yet another FreeBSD freak" :) Since years I am programing in Java and my server environment is FreeBSD. Currently I am using diablo project but it seems it is no longer active. I've heard that IBM has joined OpenJDK project and this is really good sign. I am wondering h