On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:32:39AM +, gle...@eyesbeyond.com wrote:
> Changeset: d8a5a62e4ad1
> Author:Greg Lewis
> Date: 2011-03-08 23:32 -0800
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port/jdk/rev/d8a5a62e4ad1
>
> . Add the missing define and endef lines for binary_file_
> With this change I can build again on MacOS X. Pointy hat to me for
> somehow leaving out the define and endef lines.
:-)
I still get the following error while building with OpenJDK 1.7 as bootstrap :
(cd ./langtools/make && \
make
JDK_TOPDIR=/Users/henri/Documents/jenkins/data/j
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:33:24AM +0100, Henri Gomez wrote:
> > With this change I can build again on MacOS X. ?Pointy hat to me for
> > somehow leaving out the define and endef lines.
>
> :-)
>
>
> I still get the following error while building with OpenJDK 1.7 as bootstrap :
>
> (cd ./langt
Hum, I should try it.
I was using soylatte in the old age, until someone here (I don't
remember who), told me to use OpenJDK 1.7.
And it was working up to latest changes.
Thanks Greg
2011/3/9 Greg Lewis :
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:33:24AM +0100, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> > With this change I can
FYI...
In general, using a jdk7 as the boot jdk should work.
In this case, you might send an email to the compiler-dev alias and ask if they
have seen this failure before,
might ring some bells for them.
-kto
On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hum, I should try it.
>
> I was usi
Dring, dring :)
Someone to contact in the compiler team ?
2011/3/9 Kelly O'Hair :
> FYI...
>
> In general, using a jdk7 as the boot jdk should work.
> In this case, you might send an email to the compiler-dev alias and ask if
> they have seen this failure before,
> might ring some bells for th
I'm just running the build on my CI system, using openjdk 1.6 from
macport as bootstrap VM and it seems to works well better.
2011/3/9 Stephen Bannasch :
> I'm using soylatte16-i386-1.0.3 and have backed out all my changes and John
> Roses patches and am getting an abort trap after a seemingly su
I'm using soylatte16-i386-1.0.3 and have backed out all my changes and John
Roses patches and am getting an abort trap after a
seemingly successful build:
testing build: ./build/bsd-amd64/j2sdk-image/bin/java -version
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SI
compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net
-kto
On Mar 9, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Dring, dring :)
>
> Someone to contact in the compiler team ?
>
>
>
> 2011/3/9 Kelly O'Hair :
>> FYI...
>>
>> In general, using a jdk7 as the boot jdk should work.
>> In this case, you might send an email
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:02:10PM -0500, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
> I'm using soylatte16-i386-1.0.3 and have backed out all my changes and John
> Roses patches and am getting an abort trap after a
> seemingly successful build:
>
> testing build: ./build/bsd-amd64/j2sdk-image/bin/java -version
The contents of this file:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Greg Lewis wrote:
>> /Users/stephen/dev/java/src/bsd/hs_err_pid10411.log
Would be helpful to see when there is a crash.
-kto
At 10:08 AM -0800 3/9/11, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>The contents of this file:
>
>On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Greg Lewis wrote:
>
>>>/Users/stephen/dev/java/src/bsd/hs_err_pid10411.log
>>>
>
>Would be helpful to see when there is a crash.
Ahhh .. I should have been more specific -- that data is here:
At 10:03 AM -0800 3/9/11, Greg Lewis wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:02:10PM -0500, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
>> I'm using soylatte16-i386-1.0.3 and have backed out all my changes and John
>> Roses patches and am getting an abort trap after a
>> seemingly successful build:
>>
> > testing build:
Looks like a problem in native code:
[libjvm.dylib+0x463915] JVM_ArrayCopy+0x105
-kto
On Mar 9, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
> At 10:08 AM -0800 3/9/11, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> The contents of this file:
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Greg Lewis wrote:
>>
/Users/s
At 11:57 AM -0800 3/9/11, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>Looks like a problem in native code:
>
>[libjvm.dylib+0x463915] JVM_ArrayCopy+0x105
>
Interesting ... build/bsd-amd64/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.dylib is 8 bytes
smaller than build/bsd-amd64/j2sdk-image/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.dylib
[bsd]$ fin
Greg, you build OS/X version on SnowLeopard ?
32/64 bits kernel ?
What's your make params ?
Mine are :
env -i PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin \
LANG=C \
CC=gcc-4.0 \
CXX=g++-4.0 \
make \
ALT_DROPS_DIR=$DROP_DIR \
ALT_BOOTDIR=$BOOT_STRAP_VM \
ALT_JDK_IMPORT_P
Ok I found the build problem on my build, I forgot to add some patches.
First one is for build under OS/X 64bits :
uname -m report as x86_64 and hotspot/make/bsd/makefiles/defs.make
only knows about amd64.
It was reported some times ago (ie:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/201
64bits VM build works on 64 bits machine/kernel OS/X :
I tried to build 32bits VM, still on 64 bits machine/kernel OS/X,
using the following patch
(http://code.google.com/p/openjdk-osx-build/source/browse/trunk/patches/Platform.gmk.patch)
If ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32, ARCH=i586 (even on a 64bits machine)
18 matches
Mail list logo
