Is this project this active? Are there folks here that work on the
xxxBSD ports?
JDK-8231259 [1] is a bug submitted against the
java.nio.channels.DatagramChannel implementation on macOS a few days
ago. It looks like a macOS bug, rather than a JDK bug.
The scenario is a UDP socket is bound to
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 18:38 +0100, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Is this project this active? Are there folks here that work on the
> xxxBSD ports?
>
> JDK-8231259 [1] is a bug submitted against the
> java.nio.channels.DatagramChannel implementation on macOS a few days
> ago. It looks like a macOS bug,
On 25/09/2019 19:50, Kurt Miller wrote:
:
Yes, I have observed that bug on OpenBSD as well. It is indeed
a kernel bug on OpenBSD. I have kernel patches to correct it
but haven't pushed them forward through the review process there.
I just did a quick test on FreeBSD 11 on amd64 and it also
doesn
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 20:37 +0100, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 25/09/2019 19:50, Kurt Miller wrote:
> >
> > :
> > Yes, I have observed that bug on OpenBSD as well. It is indeed
> > a kernel bug on OpenBSD. I have kernel patches to correct it
> > but haven't pushed them forward through the review proc
On 25/09/2019 21:03, Kurt Miller wrote:
:
Your welcome. It is something simple. Roughly speaking:
- set flag when bind on dgram socket sets IP addr
- when disconnecting (connect(2) called w/AF_UNSPEC) if flag
is set, don't reset it to INADDR_ANY
Thanks. One other issue that was found by the s
