's what the team wants.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
***********
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192
Nagelsweg
be
to adapt the MacPorts package accordingly. Landon or Brian may
be able to give you a better answer.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1]
http://www.getsnappy.com/tech-blog/freebsd-tips-tricks/upgrading-freebsd-port-javaopenjdk6
BSD), who
commit to the bsd-port forest.
Seriously, though - could you send a patch to the build README for
building the current sources on Mac OS X to this list? Then someone
could look at including into the bsd-port repository.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
******
point me to the URL,
and I'll add it to the port's web page.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH
Greg Lewis wrote:
> G'day Dalibor,
>
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Ray Kiddy wrote:
>>> If not, who would have the authority to create a place in whatever
>>> location would be best?
>> I would go and crea
OpenJDK.
Current tree is at bsd-port/bsd-port. Two questions:
a) Would bsd-port/jdk6 make sense for the backport?
b) Should it be populated with the current jdk6/jdk6 forest?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
***********
Dalibor Topic
Ray Kiddy wrote:
> If you cannot find the e-mails, let me know off-list and I can send
> them to you.
>
You can also fetch them from the list archive available at :
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/
cheers,
dali
K-6-7-kqueue-based-NIO-provider-td27385917.html
Another alternative could be to delegate the kqueue wrapping work to
a third party library like libev or libevent.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49
Kiddy were a real help for me so I thought
> I would make my minor contribution.
>
Thank you!
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com/>
Dalibor Topic
Phone: +49 40 23646738
Oracle
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. &am
On 8/4/10 4:00 AM, Deel Mani Baral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need the cvs repository for Java SE (jdk/Jre) .
See http://openjdk.java.net/guide/repositories.html
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com/>
Dalibor Topic
Phone: +49 40 23646738
Oracle
ORACLE Deutschlan
e JDK and Java Runtime Environment (JRE) will continue to be
available as free downloads, with no changes to the existing licensing models."
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192
O
://gbenson.net/?p=221 .
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. &a
You can use the wiki at http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJDK/BSDPort for
preserving build tips
and workarounds.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
where collaboration on OpenJDK is going to continue?
OpenJDK.java.net is the place where OpenJDK is being developed.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform
for example.
OpenJDK binaries have so far been provided by distributions, like MacPorts, or
packagers like OpenSCG. It'd be rather
easy for BSD port users to put up a page on the BSD port's wiki pointing to the
binaries at Macports, OpenCSG, etc, and to
keep it up to date, I t
27; object has no attribute 'do_read'
Open the forest.py file and change the one do_read instance to _call.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Grou
On 11/17/10 8:36 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> It seems http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port is down.
>
Looks back up again. If it reoccurs, please send an e-mail to o...@openjdk.
Thanks!
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Amba
On 11/16/10 2:58 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Dalibor,
>
> On 2010-11-14 14:41, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Open the forest.py file and change the one do_read instance to _call.
>
> One more 1.7 fix (error in sshrepo)
>
Thanks, Dmitry - looks like a similar fix went in
On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
> At 12:46 PM +0100 11/26/10, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> On 11/16/10 2:58 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>>> Dalibor,
>>>
>>> On 2010-11-14 14:41, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>>> Open the forest.py file and change the
change in
> > process for both companies. Perhaps we will have more ironed out after the
> > Thanksgiving break? I'm as eager as anyone to start breaking the _real_
> > build. :-)
I've gone ahead and proposed a Mac OS X porting project with my Porters Group
Memb
On 12/1/10 2:24 AM, Mike Swingler wrote:
> Wonderful! Thank you very much Dalibor!
>
Thanks, Mike - glad to help!
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform G
On 12/1/10 1:02 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> I've gone ahead and proposed a Mac OS X porting project with my Porters Group
> Member hat,
> with a CFV in the Porters Group, in order to allow work on the Mac OS port to
> proceed as
> quickly as possible.
The Porters Group has
On 12/2/10 10:51 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Question.
>
> Mac OS X porting project will be hosted in actual bsd-port or will
> have its own port ?
The latter - see
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2010-December/001627.html for
rationale.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
On 12/9/10 8:24 PM, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On 12/02/10 17:07, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> On 12/2/10 10:51 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Question.
>>>
>>> Mac OS X porting project will be hosted in actual bsd-port or will
>>> have its own port ?
>>
&
What's the meaning of b121 ?
>
JDK 7 b121 means it's build number 121 of JDK 7.
build 20.0-b03 is the version of the HotSpot component of the JDK.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491
On 4/4/11 6:03 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> What's the current build number in both branches (b122 ?)
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port -> b132
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/macosx-port/macosx-port/ -> b132
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibo
x/archive/2011/01/08/javadyn-dead-long-live-what
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamb
t;>
>> That's already the case. Zero was merged in some time ago.
>
> Sorry but I'm confuse. Did you mean Zero has been merged into JDK 7 or JDK 8 ?
Yes, in 2009/2010. See
http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/ZeroSharkFaq#What_is_the_status_of_Zero_and_Shark.3F
for details.
c
t; therefore are not included to BSD/MacOSX ports.
>
> Part of Oracle JDK ? Does it means, they aren't available to OS/X /
> FreeBDS users ?
You can find Rhino here: https://www.mozilla.org/rhino/
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topi
pace to avoid clashes with a user-supplied
rhino.jar, like sun.org.mozilla.javascript.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
omewhere ?
The build instructions for JDK 7 are at the URL above, if that's what you mean.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V
asses/com/sun/script/javascript/ directory
- is that what you're looking for?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | N
On 10/17/11 7:06 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> 1) Did there is any reason why Rhino is not included in bsd-port (and
> so macosx-port) like licence problems ?
Rhino is not necessary for OpenJDK to build & run, so it doesn't really
belong in the OpenJDK code base.
cheers,
dalibor to
lasses
> whereas jdk 1.7.0 for Linux came with 316 classes
>
See README.TXT.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG |
one in OpenJDK in the JDK 7 Updates Project,
as Oracle JDK 7
is based on OpenJDK 7. See the Q&A at
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/qanda.html for
more details, or feel free to ask on jdk7u-dev!
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/
should be easier to follow (and sync with) then
OpenJDK 6 was. I'd suggest syncing up with release (i.e. phase 2) branches,
as they get turned into actual update releases - so syncing with jdk7u/jdk7u2
right now, and switching over with jdk7u/jdk7u4 once that gets created when
we enter phase
On 11/23/11 4:36 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> 2011/11/23 Dalibor Topic :
>> On 11/3/11 4:01 AM, Greg Lewis wrote:
>>>> The numerous jdk7ux trees seem to continue but with new versioning
>>>> (jdk7u2-b10 at present):
>>>>
>>>> http://hg.ope
Original Message
Subject: OpenJDK wikis have moved
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:07:37 +0100
From: Dalibor Topic
To: web-disc...@openjdk.java.net
See http://robilad.livejournal.com/87.html .
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java
BSD Port section is now up on the OpenJDK install page.
On 8/3/12 4:11 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> On 8/3/12 3:57 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>>
>> Hi Iris-
>>>> I'm reluctant to provide instructions unless somebody can test it to
>>>> verify.
>> Good p
sd.org/ports/head/java/openjdk8/files/patch-hotspot-
>> src-os-bsd-vm-os_bsd.cpp?revision=391177
>>
>> Jung-uk Kim
>
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACL
it easier for the BSD port to integrate JDK 9 changes sounds fine
to me, but I'm not a JDK 9/build area Reviewer.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/2014-April/002245.html
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phon
"Lazy Consensus — There are no vetoes."
per http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus .
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 06.05.2016 19:33, Brian Gardner wrote:
Hey Greg,
How many votes did I need?
Brian
On Apr 18, 2016, at 12:35 AM, Greg Lewis wrote:
I hereby nominate Brian Gard
9 resulted in some build system changes (because of modules), and it
would be up to each port's maintainers to make sure that they keep their
port in sync in tree.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/2017-August/thread.html
--
<http://w
teers, or, ideally,
both.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwalt
44 matches
Mail list logo
