On Monday 11 February 2008, Miguel Figueiredo Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe wrote:
>
> >From what I read, current SSD are characterized by:
>
> - poor performance in random writes (because of block erasure)
> - require wear leveling, even those that emulate sata/ide/scsi disk
> with onboard wear levelin
On Monday 11 February 2008, Miguel Figueiredo Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> This might sound stupid, but since I cannot infer from the
> documentation and features of btrfs the answer to my doubts.
> Here it goes:
>
> Is the data and metadata ondisk layout of btrfs favorable for S
Hi there,
This might sound stupid, but since I cannot infer from the
documentation and features of btrfs the answer to my doubts.
Here it goes:
Is the data and metadata ondisk layout of btrfs favorable for SSDs ?
>From what I read, current SSD are characterized by:
- poor performance in random wr
On Sunday 10 February 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:00:13 -0500
>
> This function never returns an error, so the simplest fix was to
> return the hash value which avoids all of the issues. In attempting
> other schemes to fix this, I f
On 2/12/08, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008, Miguel Figueiredo Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > This might sound stupid, but since I cannot infer from the
> > documentation and features of btrfs the answer to my doubts.
> > Here it goes:
> >
