I love ]BOXING and I'm using it all the time now. It's particularly useful
when you're a beginner like myself.
Would it be possible to prevent the application of the default
]BOXINGvalue when explicitly using
⎕CR? Consider this interaction?
*]BOXING 8*
*'foo' 'bar'*
┌→──┐
│┌→─
Once one defines a native function, should the function be expungeable?
Attempting to )erase the function fails silently; applying ⎕ex to the
native function's name causes a crash.
)COPY and )PCOPY should not change wsid.
And it's done. There is now expansion of both system commands and quad
functions in the Emacs mode.
Regards,
Elias
On 2 March 2014 01:52, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> providing descriptions of functions is a lot of work. Most people know APL
> after
> a short while, and those who need it
I second that thank you. This thing is awesome. :-)
Regards,
Elias
On 3 March 2014 23:23, Daniel H. Leidisch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Juergen Sauermann
> writes:
>
> > I have added command ]BOXING which takes an argument OFF, 2, 3, 4, 7,
> > 8, or 9.
> > See SVN 152.
>
> Great, thank you very much
Hello Jürgen!
Juergen Sauermann
writes:
> I would like to explain my point of view regarding Lambdas aka.
> D-funs.
Thanks. I should mention that I am an APL beginner, so my answer will
draw from my experiences with other languages, especially functional
ones (in the functions as first class ob
Hello!
Juergen Sauermann
writes:
> I have added command ]BOXING which takes an argument OFF, 2, 3, 4, 7,
> 8, or 9.
> See SVN 152.
Great, thank you very much!
Regards,
Daniel
Hi,
I have added my first shot at recursive lambdas. SVN 153.
/// Jürgen
On 03/03/2014 02:01 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
I would like to suggest that the most convincing example is that of
consistency. If { } can be used to wrap arbitrary APL code in an
anonymous function, then it makes sense
Hi,
I have added command ]BOXING which takes an argument OFF, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8,
or 9.
See SVN 152.
/// Jürgen
On 03/02/2014 12:06 PM, Daniel H. Leidisch wrote:
Hello!
When experimenting at the REPL, I often find myself typing n⎕CR
repeatedly at the beginning of lines. As an Emacs user, it wou
I would like to suggest that the most convincing example is that of
consistency. If { } can be used to wrap arbitrary APL code in an anonymous
function, then it makes sense that you can also nest them.
I'd also like to present my previous email as an example to a situation
where I wanted nested lam
Hi David,
thanks, included in SVN 151.
/// Jürgen
On 03/03/2014 04:13 AM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
See attached.
Hello Daniel,
I would like to explain my point of view regarding Lambdas aka. D-funs.
Initially I considered them as not needed; they are not defined in the APL
standard and the rules related to them seem to be rather unclear.
After seeing some requests to support them I started thinking about
Hi,
thanks, fixed in SVN 150.
/// Jürgen
On 03/02/2014 11:50 AM, Daniel H. Leidisch wrote:
Hello!
Multiply and add doesn't seem to work with axis specifications:
(3 5⍴1) ×[1] ⍳3
INDEX ERROR
(3 5⍴1)×[1]⍳3
^ ^
INDEX ERROR
(3 5⍴1)+[1]⍳3
^ ^
I tried to define a tohex function that accepts multiple values:
{{'0123456789abcdef'[⎕IO+(4⍴16)⊤⍵]}¨⍵}
This results in the following:
*tohex ← {{'0123456789abcdef'[⎕IO+(4⍴16)⊤⍵]}¨⍵}*
SYNTAX ERROR
However, splitting it up in two functions works fine:
*tohex1 ← {'0123456789abcdef'[⎕
14 matches
Mail list logo
