jfbu writes:
Hi Jean-François,
> as I said to Mosè: perhaps in the future, some modifications could be
> considered.
Yes, absolutely. For example, it wouldn't require much effort to allow
entries of the form (REGEX . FUNCTION) in addition to (REGEX . STRING).
For such an entry,
jfbu writes:
> A guru from the LaTeX3 team tells me it can't be the case,
> thus my question is
>
>Does the message somehow come from AUCTeX ?
>
> Perhaps no, in which case sorry for the noise.
Yes, the message comes from AUCTeX. The variable
`TeX-error-description-list' is
Hi Jean-François,
2015-10-01 7:24 GMT+02:00 jfbu :
> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
> what in fact did happen.
>
> The following TeX source file
>
> \def\foo{\begingroup\foo}\foo
>
> \bye
>
> when run from a TeX-mode Emacs/AUCTeX
Le 01/10/2015 16:55, Tassilo Horn a écrit :
jfbu writes:
A guru from the LaTeX3 team tells me it can't be the case,
thus my question is
Does the message somehow come from AUCTeX ?
Perhaps no, in which case sorry for the noise.
Yes, the message comes from AUCTeX. The