bug#21595: 11.88.8; TeX help in Plain contaminated by LaTeX

2015-10-02 Thread Tassilo Horn
jfbu writes: Hi Jean-François, > as I said to Mosè: perhaps in the future, some modifications could be > considered. Yes, absolutely. For example, it wouldn't require much effort to allow entries of the form (REGEX . FUNCTION) in addition to (REGEX . STRING). For such an entry,

bug#21595: 11.88.8; TeX help in Plain contaminated by LaTeX

2015-10-01 Thread Tassilo Horn
jfbu writes: > A guru from the LaTeX3 team tells me it can't be the case, > thus my question is > >Does the message somehow come from AUCTeX ? > > Perhaps no, in which case sorry for the noise. Yes, the message comes from AUCTeX. The variable `TeX-error-description-list' is

bug#21595: 11.88.8; TeX help in Plain contaminated by LaTeX

2015-10-01 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Jean-François, 2015-10-01 7:24 GMT+02:00 jfbu : > Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and > what in fact did happen. > > The following TeX source file > > \def\foo{\begingroup\foo}\foo > > \bye > > when run from a TeX-mode Emacs/AUCTeX

bug#21595: 11.88.8; TeX help in Plain contaminated by LaTeX

2015-10-01 Thread jfbu
Le 01/10/2015 16:55, Tassilo Horn a écrit : jfbu writes: A guru from the LaTeX3 team tells me it can't be the case, thus my question is Does the message somehow come from AUCTeX ? Perhaps no, in which case sorry for the noise. Yes, the message comes from AUCTeX. The