bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Le 12/01/2017 à 20:40, Mosè Giordano a écrit : 2017-01-12 20:08 GMT+01:00 jfbu : I get the script raising to work fine, but under the condition of typing explicitely braces, i.e. \( x^{y^{z^a_b}} \) does the expected thing from the docs after having set to multi-level the

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Le 12/01/2017 à 21:43, jfbu a écrit : (some problem we discussed here months ago, which I have forgotten now) the problem was about use in .dtx file which will never have empty line in the implementation section due to % prefix. in my dtx, the documentation section has no % prefix (it has I

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Le 12 janv. 2017 à 20:40, Mosè Giordano a écrit : > 2017-01-12 20:08 GMT+01:00 jfbu : >> I get the script raising to work fine, but under the condition >> of typing explicitely braces, i.e. >> >> \( x^{y^{z^a_b}} \) >> >> does the expected thing from the docs after

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

2017-01-12 20:08 GMT+01:00 jfbu : > I get the script raising to work fine, but under the condition > of typing explicitely braces, i.e. > > \( x^{y^{z^a_b}} \) > > does the expected thing from the docs after having set to > multi-level the ‘font-latex-fontify-script’, but the thing >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

2017-01-12 20:01 GMT+01:00 jfbu : > Le 12/01/2017 à 19:57, Mosè Giordano a écrit : >> >> 2017-01-12 19:50 GMT+01:00 jfbu : >>> >>> Hi Mosè, >> >> >> What is "^" bound to? Issue >> >> C-h k ^ >> > > ^ runs the command TeX-insert-sub-or-superscript (found in

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

I get the script raising to work fine, but under the condition of typing explicitely braces, i.e. \( x^{y^{z^a_b}} \) does the expected thing from the docs after having set to multi-level the ‘font-latex-fontify-script’, but the thing about electric scripts does not seem to work \( x^y_z \)

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Le 12/01/2017 à 19:57, Mosè Giordano a écrit : 2017-01-12 19:50 GMT+01:00 jfbu : Hi Mosè, What is "^" bound to? Issue C-h k ^ ^ runs the command TeX-insert-sub-or-superscript (found in LaTeX-mode-map), which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in ‘tex.el’. It is

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hi Mosè, thanks but regarding Le 12/01/2017 à 19:37, Mosè Giordano a écrit : In any case I strongly suggest you to set `TeX-electric-sub-and-superscript' to t, I always find it very useful also for single character script (in that case braces are redundant, of course, but they improve

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hi Jean-François, 2017-01-12 8:38 GMT+01:00 jfbu : > Hi All, > > in the attached screenshot with newly released 11.90, one sees > a feature which I find a bit disturbing: all the subscripts look > like they have a leading minus sign, where in fact it is the underscore > character. >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Le 12/01/2017 à 08:38, jfbu a écrit : The foo^{\psi_n} is ok but all foo_{bar} get the underscore aligned with exact middle of brace which creates (from a distance and with an ageing user) this impression about minus signs everywhere. 1. my screenshot is possibly dependent on the font, DejaVu

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hi All, in the attached screenshot with newly released 11.90, one sees a feature which I find a bit disturbing: all the subscripts look like they have a leading minus sign, where in fact it is the underscore character. Have you discussed that in the thread already ? (I read it back then but did

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Tassilo Horn writes: > Arash Esbati writes: > >> I think there is an issue with the code since I'm getting the >> following in *Message* buffer: >> >> Error during redisplay: (jit-lock-function 1) signaled (void-function >> copy-list) > > Ah,

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Arash Esbati writes: Hi Arash, > thanks a ton for doing this. You're welcome. > I think there is an issue with the code since I'm getting the > following in *Message* buffer: > > Error during redisplay: (jit-lock-function 1) signaled (void-function > copy-list)

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Tassilo Horn writes: > I know what I did wrong. Will fix when I'm back home. Hi Tassilo, thanks a ton for doing this. I think there is an issue with the code since I'm getting the following in *Message* buffer: Error during redisplay: (jit-lock-function 1) signaled

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes: Hi Tassilo > The problem was that the face/display specs for the script chars > replaced the existing specs (math and sub/superscript), thus they were > never shrunken. Now I prepend the spec which means that the shrinking >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

2017-01-05 14:01 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn : > The problem was that the face/display specs for the script chars > replaced the existing specs (math and sub/superscript), thus they were > never shrunken. Now I prepend the spec which means that the shrinking > happens also for ^_ which

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

I know what I did wrong. Will fix when I'm back home. Bye, Tassilo Am 5. Januar 2017 13:23:00 schrieb Mosè Giordano : 2017-01-05 12:51 GMT+01:00 Mosè Giordano : In my opinion, the top of the caret should line up with the top of what it raises, see the "^{2}" in

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Mosè Giordano writes: > The bug, in my opinion, is that the "2" is slightly above of "^", and > "3" is slightly below of "_". In particular the subscript is more > problematic because it looks like it's written "-3" (ok, in my example > there are braces, ideally remove them). I

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, > The bug, in my opinion, is that the "2" is slightly above of "^", and > "3" is slightly below of "_". In particular the subscript is more > problematic because it looks like it's written "-3" (ok, in my example > there are braces, ideally remove

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

2017-01-04 18:43 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn : > Anyway, my sense for aesthetics is very rudimentary so you have to > explain to me where the bug is. What I did, however, is that I changed > the default raise values from ±0.3 to ±0.5. So indeed the superscripts > are a bit more raised

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hello everyone, I can confirm that everything works. Thanks a lot! Gennady On 04/01/17 19:58, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Mosè Giordano writes: > > Hi Mosè, > >> while trying to reproduce the problem reported by Gennady (I can >> confirm it), I noticed another glitch. Now the

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, >> while trying to reproduce the problem reported by Gennady (I can >> confirm it), I noticed another glitch. Now the baseline of the >> script is slightly above (below) of "^" ("_"), see the attached >> screenshot (left: as it was before, right: as

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, > while trying to reproduce the problem reported by Gennady (I can > confirm it), I noticed another glitch. Now the baseline of the script > is slightly above (below) of "^" ("_"), see the attached screenshot > (left: as it was before, right: as it

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

2017-01-04 17:08 GMT+01:00 Mosè Giordano : > Hi Tassilo, > > while trying to reproduce the problem reported by Gennady (I can > confirm it), I noticed another glitch. Now the baseline of the script > is slightly above (below) of "^" ("_"), see the attached screenshot > (left: as it

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Gennady Uraltsev writes: Hi Gennady, > Notice that $ is then "raised". Now erase the exponents by doing > $1=x^2|$ > $1=x^|$ > $1=x^$ > The problem is that the closing $ is still raised. I think I have fixed it. The unfontification code was only removing display

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hi Tassilo, while trying to reproduce the problem reported by Gennady (I can confirm it), I noticed another glitch. Now the baseline of the script is slightly above (below) of "^" ("_"), see the attached screenshot (left: as it was before, right: as it is now). Regarding the problem reported by

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hello Everyone, I was testing out this new mode and there seems still to be some small problem. The simplest case is as follows: write the following $1=x^2$ in the standard order and make sure that electric $ mode is off i.e. the typing should look like this (with | being the cursor): | $|

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

2017-01-03 16:27 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn : > Ok, there's a new variable `font-latex-fontify-script-max-level' which > defines up to which scriptification level the script faces are applied > again (thereby causing the decrease in font size). > >> In my pixelated example, position of

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, >> Ok, great. Committed and pushed! I'm closing this bug then. > > Thank you, this is amazing! > > A couple of requests: > > 1) could you please mention this feature in doc/changes.texi? Done! > 2) is it possible to set a limit to scaling? > >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Gennady Uraltsev writes: > Yep! Looks fantastic! >> >> Absolutely great. :-D Ok, great. Committed and pushed! I'm closing this bug then. Thanks, Tassilo signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ bug-auctex mailing

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Yep! Looks fantastic! On 03/01/17 12:17, Uwe Brauer wrote: "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes: > >> Tassilo Horn writes: > >>>> The only acceptable syntax is: >>>> >>>> $a_{b_c}$ >>> >>> Ah, right. That makes things a bit easier.

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes: > Tassilo Horn writes: >>> The only acceptable syntax is: >>> >>> $a_{b_c}$ >> >> Ah, right. That makes things a bit easier. Basically, we can assume >> that in $a^{b^c}$ the {b^c} part is already

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Gennady Uraltsev writes: > 2) LaTeX (or at least AMS) forbids expressions of the type $a_b_c$ and > $a^b^c$. > > > ERROR: Double subscript. > > --- TeX said --- > l.106 $a_b_ >c$ > --- HELP --- > There are two subscripts in a row in a mathematical >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

>>> "Gennady" == Gennady Uraltsev writes: > Hello everyone, > I am sorry for all the problems that have arisen. I wanted to contribute > to the discussion somewhat. This is for sure not your fault. > 1) Personally I often have double subscripts i.e.

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hello everyone, I am sorry for all the problems that have arisen. I wanted to contribute to the discussion somewhat. 1) Personally I often have double subscripts i.e. expressions of the form $ \int_{a_i}^{a_{i+1}} $ (I am a PhD in math) 2) LaTeX (or at least AMS) forbids expressions of the

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

> Uwe Brauer writes: > Hi Uwe, > That might indicate that you are working in a field of math where there > are few exponentiated expressions which are already exponentiated. But > I don't think that exponents have grown out of vogue in general. ;-) Well I

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Uwe Brauer writes: Hi Uwe, > I have seen his shots, these are border line cases, which are used very > little. Look I have written mathematics with latex over the last 25 > years and in countless occasions I have used ^or   but never nested > expressions and this is also true

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

> Uwe Brauer writes: > Hi Uwe, > Yes, exactly. > Sorry, but I think there's no value in a feature which only works in the > simplest cases and might be wrong otherwise. Have a look at Gennady's > screenshots. I have seen his shots, these are border line

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Uwe Brauer writes: Hi Uwe, > > Given that it doesn't work and produces even wrong results, I removed > > the complete feature, i.e., the values multi-level and invisible. I > > don't see how it could be made working without parsing the actual math > >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Uwe Brauer writes: Hi Uwe and Gennady, > Not really. I also don't really need that feature. Given that it doesn't work and produces even wrong results, I removed the complete feature, i.e., the values multi-level and invisible. I don't see how it could be made working without

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

> Gennady Uraltsev writes: > Hi Gennady, > Right. > Seems to be the case although only with scripts containing {...} with > nested scripts. > Yes, that seems to be the current behavior. > I've also re-read the docs in the meantime

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

>>> "Gennady" == Gennady Uraltsev writes: > Dear Tassilo, > Actually no, the bug appears in all three versions: 24.3 I can confirm this. The bug appears in 24.3 and auctex from elpa. Uwe ___ bug-auctex mailing

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Gennady Uraltsev writes: Hi Gennady, > The relevant variables with apropriate values are: > > font-latex-fontify-script multi-level > font-latex-scipt-display ((raise -0.3) raise 0.3) > > and the two faces > > Font Latex Superscript Face ((t > (:height 0.8))) > >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Uwe Brauer writes: Hi Uwe & Gennady, sadly I'm unable to build emacs 24.3 or 24.4 from the sources and my distro doesn't provide binary builds of any emacs version except for the current one. :-( >> Some care should be taken! After customizing the variable >>

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

>>> "Gennady" == Gennady Uraltsev writes: > Hello Everyone, > I tried installing auctex thorough elpa in emacs 24.3.1 . It was > difficult as it gave errors quite often, however after trying again > several times I managed to do it. I did this also,

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Sorry, it was version 24.5 Gennady On 01/01/17 15:10, Gennady Uraltsev wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for the delay in responding. I powered up an Ubuntu 16.10 virtual > machine and installed emacs available there (24.4) the same problem is > there. Attaching screenshot. > > Gennady > > On

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hello, Sorry for the delay in responding. I powered up an Ubuntu 16.10 virtual machine and installed emacs available there (24.4) the same problem is there. Attaching screenshot. Gennady On 01/01/17 12:51, Uwe Brauer wrote: > >> Mosè Giordano writes: >> Hi Gennady, Uwe &

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> I have 24.x,[1] but I have to change my init file because right now I >> obtain on start the following error: >> Warning (emacs): Unable to activate package `with-editor'. >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Uwe Brauer writes: > I have 24.x,[1] but I have to change my init file because right now I > obtain on start the following error: > Warning (emacs): Unable to activate package `with-editor'. with-editor is used by magit, as far as I know. > Required package `emacs-24.4' is

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

> Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Gennady, Uwe & Mosè, > [CC'ing Uwe because I know he uses this feature.] > Does anyone of you have an older Emacs copy (22.x, 23.x, 24.x) > installed and can check what the results are with that? Hm I run emacs -Q load a simple

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

> Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Gennady, Uwe & Mosè, > [CC'ing Uwe because I know he uses this feature.] > I just had a look and Gennady is correct in that there is an issue here > although what I get is a bit different from his observations. > With

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Gennady, Uwe & Mosè, [CC'ing Uwe because I know he uses this feature.] >> The multi-level fontification was introduced by >> Tassilo Horn with commit 513490f on 2015-09-03. > > Wow, I didn't even remember such change! My memory is failing :-( > >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Gennady, Uwe & Mosè, [CC'ing Uwe because I know he uses this feature.] >> The multi-level fontification was introduced by >> Tassilo Horn with commit 513490f on 2015-09-03. > > Wow, I didn't even remember such change! My memory is failing :-( > >

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

2016-12-31 15:57 GMT+01:00 Gennady Uraltsev : > Hello, > > I use Emacs a lot but I am not very familiar with coding. During this > winter break I tried to look through the code base a bit to learn. > > The multi-level fontification was introduced by > Tassilo Horn with

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hello, I use Emacs a lot but I am not very familiar with coding. During this winter break I tried to look through the code base a bit to learn. The multi-level fontification was introduced by Tassilo Horn with commit 513490f on 2015-09-03. I'll see if I manage to write a patch. The most

bug#25309: 11.89.8; multi-level script fontification stacks incorrectly

Hi Gennady, 2016-12-31 15:12 GMT+01:00 Gennady Uraltsev : > Hello, > > I have discovered multi-level fontification of sub and superscripts. Honestly, I didn't even know this feature! > However it seems slightly broken. While the scaling of the text defined > in the