Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi David,
>
> 2018-02-16 10:39 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>> Mosè Giordano writes:
>>
>>> We should make sure AUCTeX doesn't fundamentally use dynamic binding,
>>> in order to later switch to lexical binding.
>>
>> You have to pick one or the other for the equivalent of cl
Hi David,
2018-02-16 10:39 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>
>> We should make sure AUCTeX doesn't fundamentally use dynamic binding,
>> in order to later switch to lexical binding.
>
> You have to pick one or the other for the equivalent of closures.
>
> I do think we have a fe
Mosè Giordano writes:
> We should make sure AUCTeX doesn't fundamentally use dynamic binding,
> in order to later switch to lexical binding.
You have to pick one or the other for the equivalent of closures.
I do think we have a few cases of those that would benefit from lexical
binding. Should
We should make sure AUCTeX doesn't fundamentally use dynamic binding,
in order to later switch to lexical binding.
Bye,
Mosè
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
