An: reinhard.kotu...@web.de
Cc: Ikumi Keita ; d...@gnu.org; Bruckmann, Tobias
; hugo.rag...@insa-cvl.fr;
44...@debbugs.gnu.org; bug-auctex@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem
Reinhard Kotucha writes:
Hi Reinhard,
> > > I
Reinhard Kotucha writes:
Hi Reinhard,
> > > I replaced "use_any_eps_file_here" with "tiger" and saved the file
> > > under the name "xyz.tex". And I created symbolic link of tiger.eps in
> > > the current directory (in my case, /tmp/): ln -s
> > >
On 2022-01-07 at 14:14:48 +0100, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Ikumi Keita writes:
>
> > I replaced "use_any_eps_file_here" with "tiger" and saved the file
> > under the name "xyz.tex". And I created symbolic link of tiger.eps in
> > the current directory (in my case, /tmp/): ln -s
> >
Ikumi Keita writes:
> I replaced "use_any_eps_file_here" with "tiger" and saved the file
> under the name "xyz.tex". And I created symbolic link of tiger.eps in
> the current directory (in my case, /tmp/): ln -s
> /usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-dist/doc/generic/pstricks/images/tiger.eps
> .
anuar 2022 12:52
An: Ikumi Keita
Cc: Bruckmann, Tobias ; 44...@debbugs.gnu.org;
d...@gnu.org; hugo.rag...@insa-cvl.fr
Betreff: Re: bug#44578: AW: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem
Ikumi Keita writes:
>> You are right. With a test-example EPS which comes with TeXLive, i
Ikumi Keita writes:
>> You are right. With a test-example EPS which comes with TeXLive, it
>> again compiles well for me:
>
>>
>> \psfragfig[mode=errorstop,width=0.9\textwidth]{/usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/mwe/example-image}
>
> It seems that the usage of "example-image" is the source of
Hi all,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> I can reproduce on TeX Live what Hugo and Tobias say.
>
> It seems that the usage of "example-image" is the source of trouble. In
> that case, I find in the log that "example-image.tex" is read in, not
> "example-image.eps".
>
>> I have no clue about pstools, so I
Hi Tassilo and all,
I can reproduce on TeX Live what Hugo and Tobias say.
> Tassilo Horn writes:
>> The minimum example I use is
>>
>> \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
>> \usepackage[margin=2cm,a4paper]{geometry}
>> \usepackage{hyperref}
>> \title{psfrag in pdflatex }
>>
"Bruckmann, Tobias" writes:
Hi Tobias,
> The minimum example I use is
>
> \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
> \usepackage[margin=2cm,a4paper]{geometry}
> \usepackage{hyperref}
> \title{psfrag in pdflatex }
> \usepackage{graphicx}
> \usepackage{pstool}
> \usepackage{bookmark}
>
. Januar 2022 06:54
An: Hugo Raguet
Cc: 44...@debbugs.gnu.org; d...@gnu.org; Bruckmann, Tobias
; bug-auctex@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: bug#44578: Investigating current preview problem
Hugo Raguet writes:
>> I've attached it; could you and Tobias please give it a try.
>
> Unfortunately, it doe
Hugo Raguet writes:
>> I've attached it; could you and Tobias please give it a try.
>
> Unfortunately, it does not fix my problem ; for instance, the minimum
> example on the above referenced thread fails with the exact same
> problem as before if I do not apply Ulrike Fisher's workaround.
Hugo Raguet writes:
> On 06/01/2022 20:53, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>> Hugo Raguet writes:
>> Hi Hugo,
>>
>>> I am not in good position to report if this version of AUCTeX is
>>> working, because I actually never used AUCTeX. My attention came to
>>> this problem because preview is actually used in
On 06/01/2022 20:53, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Hugo Raguet writes:
Hi Hugo,
I am not in good position to report if this version of AUCTeX is
working, because I actually never used AUCTeX. My attention came to
this problem because preview is actually used in packages such as
pst-pdf (see for
Hugo Raguet writes:
Hi Hugo,
> I am not in good position to report if this version of AUCTeX is
> working, because I actually never used AUCTeX. My attention came to
> this problem because preview is actually used in packages such as
> pst-pdf (see for instance
On 06/01/2022 15:05, David Kastrup wrote:
Tassilo Horn writes
...
...
It was a well-meant pitch but in the end did not manage to make it to my
home plate.
It is a pity from my point of view because I know there simply is no legal or
financial risk (my organization would just have paid
Tassilo Horn writes:
> Hugo Raguet writes:
>
>>> That is what we are doing. Currently just held back by administrative
>>> issues, because my employer is supposed to pay the bill, but I am not
>>> sure under which tax regime this will be acceptable for its
>>> accounting.
>>
>> Unfortunately,
Hugo Raguet writes:
>> That is what we are doing. Currently just held back by administrative
>> issues, because my employer is supposed to pay the bill, but I am not
>> sure under which tax regime this will be acceptable for its
>> accounting.
>
> Unfortunately, we could not find an agreement.
Hi everyone,
On 08/10/2021 15:16, Hugo Raguet wrote:
Hello
On 08/10/2021 14:52, Tassilo Horn wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
Hi all,
I have encountered a problem involving the latex package preview
Reading reports, analysing and understanding problem: €50
Reading up on the tools LaTeX
Hello
On 08/10/2021 14:52, Tassilo Horn wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
Hi all,
I have encountered a problem involving the latex package preview
Reading reports, analysing and understanding problem: €50
Reading up on the tools LaTeX now wants instead: €30
Devising and implementing a
Hi Hugo,
>> To me the price seems absolutely reasonable (I had expected much
>> more), so I'd very much suggest Hugo & Tobias simply accept the offer
>> and share the price. Feel free to discuss that off-list and contact
>> David when you came to a conclusion.
>
> That is what we are doing.
David Kastrup writes:
Hi all,
>> I have encountered a problem involving the latex package preview. If
>> I understand well it is due to "a change in the latex shipout
>> routine" in the last versions. I read the threads on the GNU bug
>> reports 44578 and 45894 about the problem. It appears you
Hugo Raguet writes:
> Dear David Kastrup
>
> I have encountered a problem involving the latex package preview. If I
> understand well it is due to "a change in the latex shipout routine"
> in the last versions. I read the threads on the GNU bug reports 44578
> and 45894 about the problem. It
Dear David Kastrup
I have encountered a problem involving the latex package preview. If I understand well it
is due to "a change in the latex shipout routine" in the last versions. I read
the threads on the GNU bug reports 44578 and 45894 about the problem. It appears you are
the current
23 matches
Mail list logo
