bug#25245: Prettify-symbols-mode not working

2016-12-21 Thread Alex Branham
Hello - I can't seem to get prettify symbols mode to work correctly. In my .emacs I have (global-prettify-symbols-mode). According to the auctex manual, that should be enough, right? However, when I open a tex file, nothing is prettified. Weirdly, if I call M-x LaTeX-mode, then prettification

bug#27295: 11.90.2; font lock for \autocites

2017-06-09 Thread Alex Branham
Hello, Auctex does not seem to properly font lock \autocites with multiple citations. \autocites[][]{key1, key2} works fine but \autocites[][]{key1, key2}[but see][]{key3} results in neither "but see" nor "key3" getting the appropriate faces (which should be font-lock-variable-name-face and

bug#27295: 11.90.2; font lock for \autocites

2017-06-11 Thread Alex Branham
it --- "} " or "}\", perhaps? Alex On Fri 09 Jun 2017 at 20:25, Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> wrote: > Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Auctex does not seem to properly font lock \autocites with multiple >> citations. >> >>

bug#30149: [PATCH] remove some obsolete functions

2018-01-17 Thread Alex Branham
I noticed that AuCTeX recently dropped support for Emacs older than 24; this patch removes some functions that are obsolete in Emacs 24+ >From 82d89c77547d02bdbea900c5136b60d0cc59ce9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Branham <bran...@utexas.edu> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:23:36 -060

bug#30149: [Patch] incorrect patch sent

2018-01-17 Thread Alex Branham
I have only one question: > > 2018-01-17 20:45 GMT+01:00 Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com>: >> diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el >> index 5ee02b4c..d9f680b6 100644 >> --- a/tex.el >> +++ b/tex.el >> @@ -1358,9 +1358,7 @@ viewer." >> (cond

bug#30149: [Patch] remove some obsolete functions

2018-01-25 Thread Alex Branham
Helpful reminder email :-) On Wed 17 Jan 2018 at 18:22, Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed 17 Jan 2018 at 23:12, Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> thank you so much for your contribution, much appreciated! I see

bug#30423: 2018-01-25; [patch] flymake support

2018-02-11 Thread Alex Branham
Flymake got a major rewrite in Emacs 26, the attached patch adds support for this in latex.el. Users can enable it by calling adding flymake-mode to LaTeX-mode-hook. >From 0b8eeebd01d0ed25823d4f40a7ab3cff0d150b8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Branham <bran...@utexas.edu> Date

bug#30424: [patch] replace cl with cl-lib

2018-02-11 Thread Alex Branham
The attached patch replaces cl with cl-lib. >From 6bc94eaee8a189af5f847878b6280c6a1a0e4b54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Branham <bran...@utexas.edu> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:56:13 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Replace cl with cl-lib --- bib-cite.el| 5 +++-- font-latex.el

bug#30424: [patch] replace cl with cl-lib

2018-02-14 Thread Alex Branham
Turns out that this patch breaks font locking in some cases. I'll look into it and report back later. On Sun 11 Feb 2018 at 12:10, Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com> wrote: > The attached patch replaces cl with cl-lib. > > From 6bc94eaee8a189af5f847878b6280c6a1a0e4b54 Mon

bug#30423: 2018-01-25; [patch] flymake support

2018-02-15 Thread Alex Branham
Has anyone had time to look at this or test it out? On Sun 11 Feb 2018 at 12:06, Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com> wrote: > Flymake got a major rewrite in Emacs 26, the attached patch adds support for > this in latex.el. Users can enable it by calling adding flymake-mode to

bug#30424: [patch] replace cl with cl-lib

2018-02-15 Thread Alex Branham
Actually the error I was receiving was due to a dirty working tree. I don't see any problems after cleaning it up then recompiling auctex with the patch applied. On Wed 14 Feb 2018 at 09:43, Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com> wrote: > Turns out that this patch breaks font lockin

bug#30423: separate flymake into latex-flymake.el

2018-02-18 Thread Alex Branham
On Sun 18 Feb 2018 at 14:14, Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> wrote: > Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Alex, > > many thanks for your patch. Some comments: > >> +;;; latex-flymake.el --- Flymake integration -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- >

bug#30423: separate flymake into latex-flymake.el

2018-02-16 Thread Alex Branham
Here's a different version of the patch I sent with flymake support in its own file. I also removed the lexical-binding from latex.el. >From b373d749d85addd82d17fe4b6c6ec92a0c52e12b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Branham <bran...@utexas.edu> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:55:52 -060

bug#30424: [patch] replace cl with cl-lib

2018-02-16 Thread Alex Branham
On Fri 16 Feb 2018 at 02:14, Mosè Giordano wrote: > Hi Alex, > > thanks for this new patch. From what I've seen this doesn't introduce > runtime dependence on cl-lib but just replaces cl macros with > corresponding cl-lib macros, is this correct? Yes, that's right. I noticed a

bug#30423: 2018-01-25; [patch] flymake support

2018-02-16 Thread Alex Branham
es as low as possible. Understood, no dependencies added here. > 2018-02-11 19:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com>: >> Flymake got a major rewrite in Emacs 26, the attached patch adds support for >> this in latex.el. Users can enable it by calling adding flyma

bug#30423: separate flymake into latex-flymake.el

2018-02-20 Thread Alex Branham
On Tue 20 Feb 2018 at 14:17, Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> wrote: > Alex Branham <alex.bran...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sun 18 Feb 2018 at 14:14, Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> Is there a reason why you didn't add this file to

bug#30980: [PATCH] add customize option for flymake

2018-03-28 Thread Alex Branham
>From d6ec0bd5db2f5d8097b6d2e784ea3de390ff63f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Branham <bran...@utexas.edu> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:23:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] New customize option LaTeX-flymake-chktex-flags * latex-flymake.el (LaTe

bug#30640: [patch] replace last cl

2018-02-27 Thread Alex Branham
I think this takes case of the last (require 'cl) statement. Thanks, Alex >From 0befaa759ff22e9a8518c17095439fe11952e60b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Branham <bran...@utexas.edu> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:45:03 -060

bug#30548: conflicts with smartparens

2018-02-26 Thread Alex Branham
There are two smartparens bugs that may be related to this. https://github.com/Fuco1/smartparens/issues/827 TLDR; enable delete-selection-mode *before* enabling smartparens and also https://github.com/Fuco1/smartparens/issues/834 And the workaround here is to rely on smartparens rather than