Re: Bug#368502: autoconf: breaks existing build systems that use ${datadir}

2006-05-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ better keep the debian bug address in Cc: ] * Ben Pfaff wrote on Tue, May 23, 2006 at 01:34:18AM CEST: The configure script from the CVS autoconf did report warnings for the lack of datarootdir. This appears to be harmless. The two versions of configure generated identical config.h,

Re: non portable sed scripts

2006-05-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ Cc:ing bug-autoconf again ] * Tim Rice wrote on Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:13:34AM CEST: On Mon, 22 May 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Next I tried CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh /bin/sh \ /opt/src/gnu/coreutils-5.95/configure \ CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh Again a valid config.h and

Re: non portable sed scripts

2006-05-23 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | s,^\([ ]*#[]*\)[^ ]*\([ ][ ]*HAVE_DECL_NANOSLEEP\)[ (].*$,\1define\2 0 , | s,^\([ ]*#[]*\)[^ ]*\([ ][ ]*HAVE_DECL_REALLOC\)[ (].*$,\1define\2 1 , | s,^\([ ]*#[

Re: non portable sed scripts

2006-05-23 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:33:42PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: you are so bright, Ralf! this doesn't sound nice, I'm afraid. I wanted to say that it was realy clever to notice that | s,^\([ ]*#[]*\)[^ ]*\([ ][ ]*HAVE_DECL_STPCPY\)[ (].*$,\1define\2 0 , |

Re: non portable sed scripts

2006-05-23 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the 2.59 shell selection algorithm would probably(?) have selected /bin/sh as shell, whereas, due to changes we did because of OSF, /usr/bin/posix/sh is preferred now. Ouch. Good catch. I hope we get away with this. I don't think we will, since