Re: Building universal binaries makes 'check' fail

2007-03-05 Thread Paul Eggert
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are quite a number of software packages > out there that do not use config headers for whatever reason. OK, thanks, I installed this: 2007-03-05 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/autoconf.texi (C Compiler): Warn that AC_C_BIGEND

Re: Building universal binaries makes 'check' fail

2007-03-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Mar 6, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: "Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What if the package does not use AC_CONFIG_HEADERS? This patch will fail. What about AC_CHECK_SIZEOF which will report incorrect results if -arch i386 -arch x86_64 are specified for example? Those pr

Re: Building universal binaries makes 'check' fail

2007-03-05 Thread Paul Eggert
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What if the package does not use AC_CONFIG_HEADERS? This patch will > fail. What about AC_CHECK_SIZEOF which will report incorrect results > if -arch i386 -arch x86_64 are specified for example? Those problems existed in the previous Autoconf version

Re: autoconf 2.60/2.61 and Solaris 2.4

2007-03-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bruno, Bruno Haible writes: The following simple configure.ac [...] processed with autoconf 2.60 or 2.61, yields a configure script that cannot be processed on Solaris 2.4. [...] This means that autoconf >= 2.60 has dropped support for Solaris 2.4, right? I don't have access to Sol