Re: autoconf-2.62: /usr/lib64 not considered Standard dirs in X detection

2008-06-09 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Brad Walker on 4/24/2008 8:56 AM: [revisiting an old thread, based on today's conversation: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2008-06/msg00022.html] | Would you mind posting a proposed patch ported to the autoconf

Re: x_libraries setting inconsistent with manual

2008-06-09 Thread Braden McDaniel
[Grumble. A couple attempts to post this follow-up via Gmane seem to have failed. Apologies if this ends up being a duplicate.] On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 09:43 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Braden, * Braden McDaniel wrote on Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:16:55AM CEST: On my Fedora 9 x86_64

Re: x_libraries setting inconsistent with manual

2008-06-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Braden McDaniel wrote on Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:51:34PM CEST: On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 09:43 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Does the patch from http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2008-04/msg00078.html fix this for you? I would have expected it to do so. However, after

Re: x_libraries setting inconsistent with manual

2008-06-09 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 17:04 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Braden McDaniel wrote on Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:51:34PM CEST: On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 09:43 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Does the patch from http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2008-04/msg00078.html fix this for

Re: autoconf-2.62: /usr/lib64 not considered Standard dirs in X detection

2008-06-09 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Eric, On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:27:05AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: | - /usr/lib | /lib) ;; | + /usr/lib | /usr/lib64 | /lib | /lib64) ;; Your patch seems safe in my testing on 32-bit platforms. I don't have easy access to a 64-bit platform, but I went ahead and added a ChangeLog