Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 205 failed

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/23/2010 07:03 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Ralf, thanks for the bug report. * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 06:31:47AM CEST: autoconf-2.68's testsuite deterministically fails for me in test 205 for a variety of OSes: ... 205: parallel autotest and signal handling

Re: autoconf-2.68: test 199 hangs under Cygwin

2010-09-23 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/23/2010 01:03 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, I just gave autoconf-2.68 a try under Cygwin. Is this supposed to work rsp. does this work for anybody? Cygwin has known bugs with named pipes, and they are so severe that autotest parallel tests are known to fail on that platform. There's

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 205 failed

2010-09-23 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/22/2010 10:31 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: ... 205: parallel autotest and signal handling FAILED (autotest.at:1617) ... * Fedora 12/13/14 i386/x86_64 * RHEL6 beta2 i386/x86_64 Odd, because I specifically tested under these two, and it passed for me. Is there an environmental difference

Re: autoconf-2.68: test 199 hangs under Cygwin

2010-09-23 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/23/2010 06:07 AM, Eric Blake wrote: On 09/23/2010 01:03 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, I just gave autoconf-2.68 a try under Cygwin. Is this supposed to work rsp. does this work for anybody? Cygwin has known bugs with named pipes, and they are so severe that autotest parallel tests are

Re: autoconf-2.68: test 199 hangs under Cygwin

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/23/2010 02:07 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 09/23/2010 01:03 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, I just gave autoconf-2.68 a try under Cygwin. Is this supposed to work rsp. does this work for anybody? Cygwin has known bugs with named pipes, and they are so severe that autotest parallel tests

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 205 failed

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/23/2010 02:11 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 09/22/2010 10:31 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: ... 205: parallel autotest and signal handling FAILED (autotest.at:1617) ... * Fedora 12/13/14 i386/x86_64 * RHEL6 beta2 i386/x86_64 Odd, because I specifically tested under these two, and it passed for

Re: autoconf-2.68: test 199 hangs under Cygwin

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/23/2010 02:14 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 09/23/2010 06:07 AM, Eric Blake wrote: On 09/23/2010 01:03 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, I just gave autoconf-2.68 a try under Cygwin. Is this supposed to work rsp. does this work for anybody? Cygwin has known bugs with named pipes, and they are

autoconf-2.68: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Hi, I am facing a new issue/regression with autoconf-2.68: When running autoreconf on the follow configure.ac[1] -- snip -- AC_INIT([foo],[0.1]) AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([configure.ac]) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign]) AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([ #ifndef FOO choke me #endif ]) AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile])

Re: autoconf-2.68: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body

2010-09-23 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/23/2010 06:56 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, I am facing a new issue/regression with autoconf-2.68: That is not a regression, but a feature. Reread NEWS: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([ #ifndef FOO choke me #endif ]) You should have used: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([ #ifndef FOO choke

Re: autoconf-2.68: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body

2010-09-23 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/23/2010 07:52 AM, Eric Blake wrote: [hit send too soon] On 09/23/2010 06:56 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, I am facing a new issue/regression with autoconf-2.68: That is not a regression, but a feature. Reread NEWS: ** The macros AC_PREPROC_IFELSE, AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, AC_LINK_IFELSE,

Re: autoconf-2.68: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/23/2010 03:52 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 09/23/2010 06:56 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, I am facing a new issue/regression with autoconf-2.68: That is not a regression, but a feature. Your feature is my regression - It broke what appeared to have worked for ages ;) Reread NEWS:

Re: autoconf-2.68: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:33:01PM CEST: On 09/23/2010 03:52 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 09/23/2010 06:56 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I am facing a new issue/regression with autoconf-2.68: That is not a regression, but a feature. Your feature is my regression - It broke

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 199 205 261 262 failed

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Scott, * scott mc wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 06:41:30PM CEST: This was on Haiku, gcc2 build, r38734,IIRC this is similar to the results for autoconf 2.67 on Haiku. Thanks for the bug report. Can you try this patch to see whether it fixes the failures of 261 and 262 for you? It should