* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:15:56PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this should be applied to HEAD and branch-1-10.
Would you like me to do it?
Yes, please. And thanks for your review; your points all look right
to me.
Thanks. This is what I
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrit:
Can s/yy/.../ change anything unintended? E.g., do we need to ensure it
only changes words beginning with yy?
In theory it could, for example if the programmer used identifiers
beginning with, or containing `yy'. However, I can hardly imagine
* Sergey Poznyakoff wrote on Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 02:04:29PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrit:
Can s/yy/.../ change anything unintended? E.g., do we need to ensure it
only changes words beginning with yy?
In theory it could, for example if the programmer used
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues ha escrit:
Can s/yy/.../ change anything unintended? E.g., do we need to ensure it
only changes words beginning with yy?
In theory it could, for example if the programmer used identifiers
beginning with, or containing `yy'. However, I can hardly
Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrit:
I believe that it is very well known and well propagated knowledge
that the strings yy and YY are often used to mutate the result into a
unique identifier. Almost all practical documentation uses sed
substitution in the examples. In fact this may be
