Hi Adam, thanks for the report.
On 04/26/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Mercer wrote:
I've been looking at getting the version of automake in MacPorts
updated to automake-1.12 and I'm getting the following test failure:
FAIL: t/lex-depend-cxx
==
[SNIP]
+ make
/bin/sh
On 04/26/2012 10:26 AM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
Hi,
Hi Peter, thanks for the report (and the fix ;-)
I just fetched automake-1.12, built it on our no-distro x86-linux-gnu
system
uname -r: 2.6.28.6-x86_64 (most binaries are 32-bit)
/lib/libc-2.3.6.so
/lib64/libc-2.3.6.so
and
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Good idea. Can you confirm that the attached patch solves your problem?
Hi Stefano,
it does indeed.
BTW: The Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes should be unnecessary because you
should still have the paperwork from the ObjC++ integration.
Regards
tags 11346 + patch
thanks
On 04/26/2012 11:32 AM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Good idea. Can you confirm that the attached patch solves your problem?
Hi Stefano,
it does indeed.
Good. Will push shortly then.
BTW: The
Severity: minor
Reference: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11306#11
On 04/22/2012 08:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
[SNIP]
Modifying a test apparently requires me to have the same exact Autoconf
version (2.68) as you did. What an annoyance! I have to proceed like this:
1. On a
On 04/26/2012 11:38 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Will push shortly then.
Pushed now. I'm thus closing this bug report.
Thanks,
Stefano
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
because you should still have the paperwork from the ObjC++ integration.
I wasn't involved in the project yet back then, so I wasn't aware you had
the paperwork in place already. Now I am :-)
Hi Stefano,
and the whole ObjC++ integration (one
On 04/26/2012 12:10 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Severity: minor
Reference: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11306#11
On 04/22/2012 08:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
[SNIP]
Modifying a test apparently requires me to have the same exact Autoconf
version (2.68) as you did. What
On 04/26/2012 07:10 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
And here is a patch. The change itself is obvious, but I'd like a review
on the long-winded commit message. I will push by tomorrow if there is no
review by then.
The described situation could hinder hinder on-field testing or
tags 11345 patch
severity 11345 minor
close 11345
thanks
On 04/26/2012 03:56 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:42, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the attached patch solves the problem for you?
Oops, I forgot to add you to the THANKS file.
tags 11347 + patch
close 11347
thanks
On 04/26/2012 04:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/26/2012 07:10 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
And here is a patch. The change itself is obvious, but I'd like a review
on the long-winded commit message.
[SNIP] useful review
I've addressed all you nits, and
11 matches
Mail list logo
