[Summarizing the relevant points of the past discussion, somewhat]
Eric Blake wrote:
But with m4, you can arrange for AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE to redefine AC_PROG_CC
so that it hooks in a call to AM_PROG_CC_C_O immediately after its
current definition, and thus still preserve desired ordering while
On 01/11/2013 09:30 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] compile: avoid AC_PROG_CC messy rewrite
Instead, only touch up AC_PROG_CC to distribute the 'compile' script and
to rewrite $CC if a losing compiler is detected. We can do so because
Autoconf 2.70 (which we now requires) has
On 01/10/2013 06:33 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Reference:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13378#50
@acindex AC_PROG_CC_C_O
-This is like @code{AC_PROG_CC_C_O}, but it generates its results in
-the manner required by Automake. You must use this instead of
On 01/11/2013 06:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/11/2013 09:30 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] compile: avoid AC_PROG_CC messy rewrite
Instead, only touch up AC_PROG_CC to distribute the 'compile' script and
to rewrite $CC if a losing compiler is detected. We can do so because
On 01/11/2013 07:19 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/10/2013 06:33 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Reference:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13378#50
@acindex AC_PROG_CC_C_O
-This is like @code{AC_PROG_CC_C_O}, but it generates its results in
-the manner required by Automake. You
On 01/11/2013 07:19 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/10/2013 06:33 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Reference:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13378#50
@acindex AC_PROG_CC_C_O
-This is like @code{AC_PROG_CC_C_O}, but it generates its results in
-the manner required by Automake. You
Il 03/01/2013 21:53, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
Severity: wishlist
[This is posted also to the automake and texinfo lists to ensure
a wider audience. Discussion should continue exclusively on the
bug-automake list, to avoid a cross-posting flood]
Automake-generated have for a long
