* Paul Eggert wrote on Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 09:13:38AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * NEWS, doc/autoconf.texi (AC_LIBOBJ vs LIBOBJS): Mark
> > `LIBOBJDIR' as experimental.
>
> That change looks good to me; thanks.
Applied. For autoconf-patches reference, her
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * NEWS, doc/autoconf.texi (AC_LIBOBJ vs LIBOBJS): Mark
> `LIBOBJDIR' as experimental.
That change looks good to me; thanks.
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:03:16PM CEST:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:28:53PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> > >>> "SK" == Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > SK> But if we release versions with LIBOBJDIR, we will be bounded to
> > SK> support it in future rele
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:28:53PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "SK" == Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SK> But if we release versions with LIBOBJDIR, we will be bounded to
> SK> support it in future releases, even in case that it will become
> SK> redundant.
>
>
>>> "SK" == Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SK> current CVS versions of Autoconf and Automake use make variable
SK> LIBOBJDIR, to enable using AC_LIBOBJ with non-recursive makefiles.
Among other uses.
SK> But if we release versions with LIBOBJDIR, we will be bounded to
SK> support i
Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is why I'd like to ask you to consider marking the feature
> as experimental, and adding a warning that it may disappear in
> future releases.
That sounds fine to me, but we need a real patch.
Hi Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 10:42:23PM CEST:
>
[ LIBOBJDIR ]
>
> That is why I'd like to ask you to consider marking the feature
> as experimental, and adding a warning that it may disappear in
> future releases.
Could you post a patch/patches to this end?
(Since this
Hello,
current CVS versions of Autoconf and Automake use make variable
LIBOBJDIR, to enable using AC_LIBOBJ with non-recursive makefiles.
I think this is not the best possible solution to the problem.
I hoped to submit an alternative solution, which would mean that
LIBOBJDIR could have beed remo