Sorry for replying late.
Thanks a lot for solving the issue!
--
Luca Saiu
* My personal web site: http://ageinghacker.net
* GNU epsilon: http://www.gnu.org/software/epsilon
* Jitter:http://ageinghacker.net/projects/jitter
I support everyone's freedom of mocking any
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 6:55 PM Luca Saiu wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-10 at 14:24 +0100, Luca Saiu wrote:
>
> > using lisp_DATA rather than lisp_LISP prevents the misbehavior.
>
> But, incidentally, using lisp_DATA also prevents tag generation from the
> Emacs Lisp sources.
Thanks to both of you. Karl
On 2019-11-10 at 14:24 +0100, Luca Saiu wrote:
> using lisp_DATA rather than lisp_LISP prevents the misbehavior.
But, incidentally, using lisp_DATA also prevents tag generation from the
Emacs Lisp sources.
--
Luca Saiu
* My personal web site: http://ageinghacker.net
* GNU epsilon:
My overcomplicated and probably incorrect Gnus setup keeps misbehaving,
messing up the text I add manually to a message containing attachments.
I apologize for the noise.
Let me reproduce here what was probably encoded incorrectly in the
message I have just sent.
Hello Karl, and thanks for
Hello Karl, and thanks for investigating the problem.
On 2019-11-09 at 15:10 -0700, Karl Berry wrote:
> If you can easily make a minimal Makefile.am that exhibits the
> problem, that would be great.
Of course. I put together a minimal set of files to exhibit the
problem. Notice that some file
Hi Luca - not that I am an official automake maintainer, but thanks for
the report, and sorry for the lack of response. Your fix looks right to
me, FWIW. I hope Jim or I or someone will commit it soon. Creating the
test case will surely consume the most time. If you can easily make a
minimal
I apologize for brutally forwarding this message from a few weeks ago,
apparently with an incorrect GPG signature -- The signature issue is a
problem on my side.
I was meaning to send a gentle ping, after possibly writing to the wrong
list.
Best regards,
--
Luca Saiu
* My personal web site:
