Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:49:35PM CET:
>> -dist_man_MANS = $(MAN)
>> +# We must include at least one literal name here, so that
>> +# automake-1.10.1 emits the required install-man* rules.
>> +dist_man_MANS = rm.1 $(MAN)
>
> You can
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:49:35PM CET:
> -dist_man_MANS = $(MAN)
> +# We must include at least one literal name here, so that
> +# automake-1.10.1 emits the required install-man* rules.
> +dist_man_MANS = rm.1 $(MAN)
You can instead also just s/dist_man_MANS/dist_man
"Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:41:14PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> "Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:27:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> >> There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so...
>> >
>>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:41:14PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> "Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:27:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so...
> >
> > Something odd happened with generated man/Makefil
"Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:27:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so...
>
> Something odd happened with generated man/Makefile.in file,
> it is no longer going to build and install manpages because