* Reuben Thomas wrote on Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:38:55PM CEST:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What do you mean by allow it to be required. You can require it now
for your package using autotools.
Right, and my original question was to ask how do I require GNU Make in
an
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:40:31 Reuben Thomas wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
indeed, part of any other widely used package, and with the following:
In fact, gnulib already has a gnu-make module that adds a conditional
which you can use to add GNU make-specific code.
I
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:40:31 Reuben Thomas wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
indeed, part of any other widely used package, and with the following:
In fact, gnulib already has a gnu-make module that adds a conditional
which you
Hello Reuben,
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:15:43PM CEST:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what would be cool is if automake processed some GNU makeisms in the .am -
.in step. personally, i use some things like $(wildcard) and $(patsubst)
because i hate having to
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What do you mean by allow it to be required. You can require it now
for your package using autotools.
Right, and my original question was to ask how do I require GNU Make in an
autotoolised package? I'm still don't see an official answer to that
On Monday 06 April 2009 16:32:35 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:15:43PM CEST:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what would be cool is if automake processed some GNU makeisms in the .am
- .in step. personally, i use some things like
Hello Reuben,
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 02:01:15AM CEST:
Is there a standard way to make an autotoolised build system require GNU
Make? I'm getting a bit fed up having to express everything in POSIX make
when most systems now seem to have GNU Make, even where it's not
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009 20:01:15 Reuben Thomas wrote:
Is there a standard way to make an autotoolised build system require GNU
Make? I'm getting a bit fed up having to express everything in POSIX make
when most systems now seem to have GNU Make, even
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
You could test '$MAKE --help' at configure time, but the problem is, few
users remember to use './configure MAKE=gmake gmake', most just do
'./configure gmake'. You would teach them! :-)
Ah, so there's no test that does this already?
I would
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:44:48PM CEST:
I would imagine an AC_MAKE_GNU (or somesuch) that looks at make's help
output, then tries gmake (and gnumake?) if make is not GNU Make.
Oh, and I've just found check_gnu_make.m4 in autoconf-archive.
Ah, I didn't know this macro
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:44:48PM CEST:
I would imagine an AC_MAKE_GNU (or somesuch) that looks at make's help
output, then tries gmake (and gnumake?) if make is not GNU Make.
Oh, and I've just found check_gnu_make.m4 in
On Saturday 04 April 2009 12:35:08 Reuben Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:44:48PM CEST:
I would imagine an AC_MAKE_GNU (or somesuch) that looks at make's help
output, then tries gmake (and gnumake?) if make is not GNU
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
maybe use GNUmakefile.am rather than Makefile.am ? and then keep a dummy
Makefile around that merely says hey sucka, GNU-make only! and/or just re-
run the specified command as gmake ...
Thanks. I've actually for one reason and another managed to
On Saturday 04 April 2009 14:55:01 Reuben Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
maybe use GNUmakefile.am rather than Makefile.am ? and then keep a dummy
Makefile around that merely says hey sucka, GNU-make only! and/or just
re- run the specified command as gmake ...
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what would be cool is if automake processed some GNU makeisms in the .am -
.in step. personally, i use some things like $(wildcard) and $(patsubst)
because i hate having to hand maintain a huge list of files -- i inevitably
add more and forget to
Is there a standard way to make an autotoolised build system require GNU
Make? I'm getting a bit fed up having to express everything in POSIX make
when most systems now seem to have GNU Make, even where it's not installed
as the default make.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | fiction, n. fact
On Friday 03 April 2009 20:01:15 Reuben Thomas wrote:
Is there a standard way to make an autotoolised build system require GNU
Make? I'm getting a bit fed up having to express everything in POSIX make
when most systems now seem to have GNU Make, even where it's not installed
as the default
17 matches
Mail list logo
