On Wednesday 19 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:20:05AM CEST:
On Sunday 16 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What happens if I write
include fragment-with-typo-in-name.am
but I want that fragment included?
I fear I
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:20:05AM CEST:
On Sunday 16 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What happens if I write
include fragment-with-typo-in-name.am
but I want that fragment included?
I fear I cannot parse this question... Do you mean that you want to
On Sunday 16 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello,
Hi Ralf.
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:27:12PM CEST:
On Sunday 15 November 2009, Peter Johansson wrote:
make: *** No rule to make target `aminclude.am', needed by
`Makefile.in'. Stop.
This is very
[me going through veeery old backlogs...]
References:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2009-11/msg5.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2009-11/msg8.html
On Sunday 15 November 2009, Peter Johansson wrote:
Hello,
Hi Peter and automakers, and sorry for
Hello,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:27:12PM CEST:
On Sunday 15 November 2009, Peter Johansson wrote:
make: *** No rule to make target `aminclude.am', needed by
`Makefile.in'. Stop.
This is very similar to the deleted header file problem for *.m4 files
that
