Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
not on my system it doesn't. maybe a difference in bash versions. as soon
as
one process quits, the `wait` is interrupted, a new one is forked, and the
parent goes back to sleep until another child exits. if i don't `set -m`,
then i see what
Am 05.05.2012 06:35, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Friday 04 May 2012 15:25:25 John Kearney wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 21:13, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Friday 04 May 2012 15:02:27 John Kearney wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 20:53, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Friday 04 May 2012 13:46:32 Andreas Schwab wrote:
This mail has gone slightly off-topic. Hit mark as read if you don't care for
that sort of thing.
On 27 Apr 2012, at 21:02, Linda Walsh wrote:
Greg Wooledge wrote:
NEVER use eval plus a brace expansion to generate a list. That's just
freakin' evil. And unsafe:
But I _like_ evil
Maarten Billemont wrote:
This mail has gone slightly off-topic. Hit mark as read if you don't
care for that sort of thing.
I don't care if you like evil in your sexual play or in your vendettas.
When you write code, evil is nothing worth liking. In programming,
evil is defined as
Colin McEwan colin.mce...@gmail.com writes:
I frequently find myself these days writing shell scripts, to run on
multi-core machines, which could easily exploit lots of parallelism (eg. a
batch of a hundred independent simulations).
The basic parallelism construct of '' for async execution
Am 05.05.2012 06:28, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Friday 04 May 2012 16:17:02 Chet Ramey wrote:
On 5/4/12 2:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it might be a little racy (wrt checking cnt = 10 and then doing a wait),
but this is good enough for some things. it does lose visibility into
which pids are
