2017-02-02 22:26:22 +0530, Jyoti B Tenginakai:
[...]
> I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf
> is , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the
> inputs i.e.
> In my script I am generically using echo for all the options. If I have to
> use
On 2/2/17 11:56 AM, Jyoti B Tenginakai wrote:
> HI All,
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
> I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf is
> , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the inputs
> i.e.
> In my script I am generically using
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Jyoti B Tenginakai
wrote:
> HI All,
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
> I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf
> is , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the
> inputs i.e.
> In
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 10:26:22PM +0530, Jyoti B Tenginakai wrote:
> I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf
> is , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the
> inputs i.e.
But what echo prints is by definition inconsistent across platforms
HI All,
Thanks for your quick response.
I have tried using the printf instead of echo. But the issue with printf
is , the behaviour is not consistent with what echo prints for all the
inputs i.e.
In my script I am generically using echo for all the options. If I have to
use printf instead of it
El jue., feb. 2, 2017 9:00 AM, Sangamesh Mallayya <
sangamesh.sw...@in.ibm.com> escribió:
> [...]
>
> Please let us know if this a bug or do we have any other option to print
> -n ?
>
Use the printf builtin command. What you encountered is a known limitation
of the echo command, as specified by
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Sangamesh Mallayya <
sangamesh.sw...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> description:
> in bash echo -n , echo -e , echo -E has a special meaning. But we do not
> have a way in bash shell if we want to print
> -n , -e and -E using echo command. Other shells supports
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Sangamesh Mallayya <
sangamesh.sw...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> description:
> in bash echo -n , echo -e , echo -E has a special meaning. But we do not
> have a way in bash shell if we want to print
> -n , -e and -E using echo command. Other shells supports
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:32:00PM +0530, Sangamesh Mallayya wrote:
> in bash echo -n , echo -e , echo -E has a special meaning. But we do not
> have a way in bash shell if we want to print
> -n , -e and -E using echo command. Other shells supports printing of
> -n/-e/-E options using echo
Hi,
description:
in bash echo -n , echo -e , echo -E has a special meaning. But we do not
have a way in bash shell if we want to print
-n , -e and -E using echo command. Other shells supports printing of
-n/-e/-E options using echo command.
For example
with ksh
# echo -n
-n
#
with bash
10 matches
Mail list logo