Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste

2020-03-25 Thread Daniel Colascione
> On 3/25/20 1:14 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > >> Ping? Anything I can do to help? > > OK, I sat down and looked at this code, since I'm homebound. I added the > active mark/region features (rl_activate_mark/rl_deactivate_mark/etc.) > and a couple of the smaller pieces (_rl_cr, the so/se

Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste

2020-03-25 Thread Chet Ramey
On 3/25/20 1:14 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > Ping? Anything I can do to help? OK, I sat down and looked at this code, since I'm homebound. I added the active mark/region features (rl_activate_mark/rl_deactivate_mark/etc.) and a couple of the smaller pieces (_rl_cr, the so/se sequences). Can

Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste

2020-03-25 Thread Daniel Colascione
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 5:34 AM Chet Ramey wrote: > > On 1/8/20 2:38 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:20 PM Daniel Colascione > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:36 AM Chet Ramey wrote: > >>> > >>> On 9/23/19 7:32 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > On

process substitution bug or difference from bash 4.4

2020-03-25 Thread Valentin Lab
Hi, I have encountered an issue when running some bash code from 4.4 on a bash 5 ... I've managed to pinpoint the exact issue on my end. Here are 2 functions that are quite similar, except the usage of "{ ; }" around the "cat": ## ouch() { cat < <(echo bar) cat

Re: [PATCH] (Debian, testing) bash.1: Remove superfluous '.PP' and whitespace

2020-03-25 Thread Chet Ramey
On 3/24/20 4:22 PM, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: > Bash Version: 5.0 > Patch Level: 16 > Release Status: release > > Description: > [Detailed description of the problem, suggestion, or complaint.] > > The input file is from Debian testing. > > Warnings from "mandoc" and "test-groff".